Conquer Club

Make RANDOM BONUS CARDS an option.
In addition to Escalating, Flat or No Cards.

The way it would work:

Have the lowest in the deck being a 4 and the highest a 15; incremented like so....4,6,8,10,15. It should stop at 15 but cycle through as many times as necessary. Bonus numbers should not repeat until all other numbers have been drawn. For example, if a player gets a 15 upon his first bonus, that 15 should not show up again until all other numbers have been given out. So the random part would be in sets of 5. Random example......15,4,8,6,10......8,4,10,15,6......6,10,15,4,8.....and so on.

The logistics I'll leave to the program writers, but you get the idea.

What a way to level the playing field! Conquerers beware!
It gives the little guy a chance to come back.
[/i]

Sychamore wrote:What a way to level the playing field! Conquerers beware!
It gives the little guy a chance to come back.

Escalating does that fine aswell But I see you where you're coming from.. But 15 in first cash in? Bah, no.

I can just see it now:

The cards are not random, i got 10 4s in a row!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!111!!11!!!!!

[inset username here] is a haker he go 2 15s in a row!!!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!1!11!1!!

IMO it would just add more luck to the game but dice and the card options that we have right now are doing it already enough. The side of strategy would get very unimportant with these cards options. Though I guess there are people who would like to play those cards.

Telvannia wrote:I can just see it now:

The cards are not random, i got 10 4s in a row!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!111!!11!!!!!

[inset username here] is a haker he go 2 15s in a row!!!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!1!11!1!!

This is a moot point. If hackers would be hacking, why not do it regardless of game type??
BUT you bring up a point, the issue of complaints and bugs. Even if there were no hackers people would complain that [insert user name] got 15's back to back.....
if you read my original suggestion you would see that it is possible to get 2 15's back to back. It would only be possible after the 5th bonus card is drawn. For example, the 5th card in the first set of 5 could be a 15, and the 1st card of the 2nd set of 5 could be 15.
Too much? yeah maybe. if anyone has a suggestion regarding the values being used that's fine, but i think the concept might be a good one.

Skittles! wrote:

Sychamore wrote:What a way to level the playing field! Conquerers beware!
It gives the little guy a chance to come back.

Escalating does that fine aswell But I see you where you're coming from.. But 15 in first cash in? Bah, no.

ok, so write it that you can't get a 15 for the first set of 5 or something, until you've cycled throught the first set. I'm open to suggestions.
I still think it's a good concept. let's try to work with it.