1756284648
1756284648 Conquer Club • View topic - unfair point loss
Page 1 of 1

unfair point loss

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:48 pm
by clayzigzag
i recently played a game. lost but had a fun time. when i looked down into the box i had lost about 20 points. "so"i said then looked at someone who had ben deadbeated after playing only one turn. he lost 4 points. how does he loose less points hen i played so much better than him, i dont get it. its not fair point loss. i should have the amount of points deducted depending on how i play not at random. that is what i am suggesting, points be deducted on how you play the game. well or unwell not at random. anyone else have this problem? feel free to tell storys

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:52 pm
by soundout9
Ya i dont like that either but thats just how the score goes. you obviously had a higher score than the other guy that lost 4. But you still lost so you lose points. I'd rather have points for 1st and 2nd place but that has been rejected

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:58 pm
by Herakilla
the system is

(loser's score / winner's score) * 20, up to a maximum of 100 points from each opponent.


so either that player had VERY FEW points or the winner had A LOT of points

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:20 pm
by insomniacdude
Herakilla wrote:the system is

(loser's score / winner's score) * 20, up to a maximum of 100 points from each opponent.


so either that player had VERY FEW points or the winner had A LOT of points


Most likely the former, since the original poster said he only lost 20 points and he's a Private First Class.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:01 pm
by clayzigzag
i guess that makes sense the guy who beat me had 700 more points than me and the guy who lost 4 points had 700 less than me

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:04 pm
by WalkingShadow
cry me a river dude

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:06 pm
by Risktaker17
I offered a change to the score but no one liked it. I wanted

(winner score/loser score) * 10 + 10

This takes a small emphasis of rank but it was rejected. I still like it.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 10:14 pm
by DiM
Risktaker17 wrote:I offered a change to the score but no one liked it. I wanted

(winner score/loser score) * 10 + 10

This takes a small emphasis of rank but it was rejected. I still like it.


yeah :lol:

if your idea is implemented then all high rankers will play only cooks or lower.

let's see (2500/500)*10 + 10 = 60 points.
so if a major beats a cook he gets 60 points.
if a cook beats a major he gets 12 points :lol:

if this would be implemented i'd be a field marshal in a week :lol:

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:55 pm
by Risktaker17
wait flip it the other way! haha. Yeah its
(losers score/winner's score) *10 +10