Page 1 of 1

Suggestion: Lower increase value for cards turned in

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:23 am
by Fire Mario
<Subject>:
Concise Idea:Have each set of cards be worth one more than the previous set

<Body>:

Suggestion Idea: See first line

Specifics: Each set of cards would give you only one more army than the previous set. Sets would still start at 4 armies but increase by one each time a set is turned in. For example: A set of cards have been turned in for 4 armies. The next set would be worth 5 armies, and the one after that is worth 6, and so on...

Why it is needed: It would be an card option that enforces strategy instead of building up mass forces and ruling the map with an iron fist. This will be similar to the Escalating option, but have a small increase each set.

The idea was from the rule variations section of my risk rule book.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:25 am
by soundout9
Thats "escalating" cards on game types #-o

Game Type: Standard, Terminator, Assassin, Doubles, Triples
Play Order: Freestyle, Sequential
Bonus Cards: Escalating, Flat Rate, No Cards
Fortifications: Chained, Adjacent, Unlimited
Fog of War: No, Yes

Thats exatually what you are describing

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:27 am
by Fire Mario
I'm talking about the small amount of armies that you get per set of cards until the later stages of the game.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:29 am
by soundout9
:?:

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:31 am
by Fire Mario
Fine, i'll edit it.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:33 am
by Fire Mario
There, edited. i hope you are happy.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:41 am
by soundout9
so bassiclly you just want the cards to increase by one every time some1 turns in a set?

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:18 am
by Fire Mario
yes. I said it could be another card option.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:53 am
by Risktaker17
I don't think the suggestion is big enough to have lack spend time adding it.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:00 am
by yeti_c
Actually this has been suggested before - and I believe is on the TODO...

C.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:01 am
by Fire Mario
I was just hoping that it would be a part of another update. It was one of the rule variations in my risk rulebook that I wouldn't mind seeing being put on the site.