1756310281
1756310281 Conquer Club • View topic - vacation, let someone else play button
Conquer Club

vacation, let someone else play button

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Like idea of allowing unkown individuals take over?

Poll ended at Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:40 am

Don't like this idea AT ALL!
3
50%
I like it, but would prefer if only those close in rank can take over play.
3
50%
 
Total votes : 6

vacation, let someone else play button

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:40 am

I have had to leave more than one game, due to emergiencies, but because I do not know any other players, end up simply deadbeating. Also, even those who know people may not want to give out their personal password (even if it can be changed later). What about settiing up a button/system whereby someone can punch in a button and more or less advertise for someone else to play the game.

Here's how I see it working. The botton is on the active board, perhaps near the bottom or off to the far right so on cannot accidentally mix it up with the regular turn button. Once you push it, a special access code would generate for that game only (this might mean adding a tag to everyone already in the game, though I suspect you already do something of the sort to keep games limited). Then either anyone at all can joing the game or anyone with a certain rank range (say a rank or two to either side of the one leaving). Points would either go solely to the new person or would be split equally. Splitting would help defray the problem some new people might swoop in on an experienced person's game and gain a bunch of points or losing a bunch of points, but might be too complicated to program. In either case, I think folks would prefer these options to the current "let's sit and wait". Also, it would not solve unexpected issues like power outages, etc. However, I think a good many non-newbie misses are predictable. Also, if folks had options, it would be easier to tell if someone is repeatedly deadbeating/missing or really having outside problems.

SORRY, goofed on setting up poll -- no positive response allowed. This pretty much negates poll. OOPS.
Last edited by PLAYER57832 on Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby firth4eva on Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:53 am

you mean account watching
User avatar
Captain firth4eva
 
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Postby GreecePwns on Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:06 am

firth4eva wrote:you mean account watching
Yes, except if you can't find anyone, have to spot open to the public (i think)
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.

Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
User avatar
Corporal GreecePwns
 
Posts: 2656
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:19 pm
Location: Lawn Guy Lint

Postby Coleman on Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:10 am

I think it would be nice to have a more formal account watching feature. One with maybe some security. Like you could set a name to be able to login to your account with their password for a set time (like you can set a poll for) and they can't post as you, they can only play your games and join tournament games.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby spiesr on Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:11 am

I think he means that you ataully get replaced in the game. As in your account isn no longer in the game, someone else's is...
User avatar
Captain spiesr
 
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota

Postby PLAYER57832 on Thu Nov 01, 2007 3:06 pm

I did mean account watching with a temporary password attached to either the game or the player. Might be too technically difficult?


Any way, I had an emergency and ended up deadbeating some games because I had no way to get anyone else to play. Sometimes, of course, we don't have warning, but I did. I can see how some folks might abuse it, but I think it would work as long as there were limits on the number of times a person could use the feature, perhaps even some kind of mild penalty for its use. Enough so that, say low-ranked folks won't use this as a way to "artificially" boost their rating. However, the bottom line is that even if abused, it is probably still a better option than just having to deadbeat.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania


Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users