Moderator: Community Team
hulmey wrote:How will A miss his turn if he has already taken it?
treefiddy wrote:Your example is a bit off. B would start his turn and finish right when the game started. A would then make his turn and finish. Now B can wait almost 24 hours to force the other player to lose their turn.
"That's the beast of freestyle" is not a way to produce a fun atmosphere for new and old members. Having 30 seconds to take your turn is not fun, nor is it anywhere in the realm of fair.
I like this idea. It would still allow freestyle to be freestyle while eliminating the ability to abuse it.
misterman10 wrote:This is ridiculous, if you don't like this hole in the system then dont play freestyle
misterman10 wrote:ya, but if you dont like this in a 1v1 game, then play sequential, thats essentially what it is
misterman10 wrote:This is ridiculous, if you don't like this hole in the system then dont play freestyle
DiM wrote:misterman10 wrote:This is ridiculous, if you don't like this hole in the system then dont play freestyle
smart remark mate.
why not improve the freestyle? why leave it as it is?
as treefiddy said above if this suggestion is implemented the fun of freestyle still remains.
you still can take your turns at the same time as your opponent but the bug is removed.
misterman10 wrote:DiM wrote:misterman10 wrote:This is ridiculous, if you don't like this hole in the system then dont play freestyle
smart remark mate.
why not improve the freestyle? why leave it as it is?
as treefiddy said above if this suggestion is implemented the fun of freestyle still remains.
you still can take your turns at the same time as your opponent but the bug is removed.
ya, but it is actually just like sequential then. I have seen too many people complain about the freestyle bug in 1v1's when all they have to do is play sequential. I know that you want to keep the simultaneous play in freestyle, and in that case I suggest you find a friend on CC, or some trustworthy people to play with
DiM wrote:misterman10 wrote:DiM wrote:misterman10 wrote:This is ridiculous, if you don't like this hole in the system then dont play freestyle
smart remark mate.
why not improve the freestyle? why leave it as it is?
as treefiddy said above if this suggestion is implemented the fun of freestyle still remains.
you still can take your turns at the same time as your opponent but the bug is removed.
ya, but it is actually just like sequential then. I have seen too many people complain about the freestyle bug in 1v1's when all they have to do is play sequential. I know that you want to keep the simultaneous play in freestyle, and in that case I suggest you find a friend on CC, or some trustworthy people to play with
you don't get it.
the difference between freestyle and sequential is that in sequential you take your turn then i take mine then you take yours and so on.
in freestyle we can both take our turns at the same time. BUT if i'm a jerk then i can force you to miss a turn by taking mine at the end of the 24 hours. with my suggestion freestyle remains the same meaning we can still take our turns at the same time but i will no longer be able to force you to miss your turn. it's simple. keep the fun but remove the pain.
misterman10 wrote:DiM wrote:misterman10 wrote:DiM wrote:misterman10 wrote:This is ridiculous, if you don't like this hole in the system then dont play freestyle
smart remark mate.
why not improve the freestyle? why leave it as it is?
as treefiddy said above if this suggestion is implemented the fun of freestyle still remains.
you still can take your turns at the same time as your opponent but the bug is removed.
ya, but it is actually just like sequential then. I have seen too many people complain about the freestyle bug in 1v1's when all they have to do is play sequential. I know that you want to keep the simultaneous play in freestyle, and in that case I suggest you find a friend on CC, or some trustworthy people to play with
you don't get it.
the difference between freestyle and sequential is that in sequential you take your turn then i take mine then you take yours and so on.
in freestyle we can both take our turns at the same time. BUT if i'm a jerk then i can force you to miss a turn by taking mine at the end of the 24 hours. with my suggestion freestyle remains the same meaning we can still take our turns at the same time but i will no longer be able to force you to miss your turn. it's simple. keep the fun but remove the pain.
rebelman wrote:I agree with DiMs proposal it would make freestyle a lot more appealing option to many especially weaker players like myself. You get to make simultaneous moves which obviously you can't do in sequential, but a more experienced player will no longer be able to manipulate the rules (quite legally) to in effect make you miss or fail to complete your turn. the other plus this would have is you can still start quickly and break a defence if you are lucky which obviously would not be possible if you were playing sequential.
misterman10 wrote:ya, but if you dont like this in a 1v1 game, then play sequential, thats essentially what it is
...it is actually just like sequential then. I have seen too many people complain about the freestyle bug in 1v1's when all they have to do is play sequential.
BaldAdonis wrote:misterman10 wrote:ya, but if you dont like this in a 1v1 game, then play sequential, thats essentially what it is
...it is actually just like sequential then. I have seen too many people complain about the freestyle bug in 1v1's when all they have to do is play sequential.
The same thing can happen in larger freestyle games when it's down to 2 players, so even when you're not playing 1v1 you can fall victim to this, and at a time when it is most important not to miss turns.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users