Old idea! With a twist!

Posted:
Sat Jun 09, 2007 3:28 pm
by Risktaker17
Subject: when a game starts put down people instead of 3 everywhere
Body: The big problem with this idea though is it would take a very long time, so i propose that you do not see any one elses country's or how many men they put on each. There is 24 hours for people to put their guys down. You only see your countries and decide how many to put on each. Finally so many people get confused about this last part. This will not be standard it will just be AN OPTION!
Priotiy: 5 because I hate getting my guys where i won't use them.

Posted:
Sat Jun 09, 2007 5:42 pm
by dominationnation
change the title. Call it "Old Idea. Ill come back later with a twist" there is nothing new in your susgestion.

Posted:
Sat Jun 09, 2007 5:46 pm
by Risktaker17
dominationnation wrote:change the title. Call it "Old Idea. Ill come back later with a twist" there is nothing new in your susgestion.
I apologize. I thought all of the older ideas said that each person would put a few guys down then wait for the other guys. I don't remember in any thread that said that you would place your guys and not see anybody else. But fine I'll add my twist. If someone doesn't show up they are not booted they just have all their territories with 3. Haha that is a decent twist.

Posted:
Sat Jun 09, 2007 5:52 pm
by dominationnation
Risktaker17 wrote:dominationnation wrote:change the title. Call it "Old Idea. Ill come back later with a twist" there is nothing new in your susgestion.
I apologize. I thought all of the older ideas said that each person would put a few guys down then wait for the other guys. I don't remember in any thread that said that you would place your guys and not see anybody else. But fine I'll add my twist. If someone doesn't show up they are not booted they just have all their territories with 3. Haha that is a decent twist.
once again not a twist. I dont know if that was formally talked about but that is what would happen. Good ideas you are just a little late

Posted:
Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:05 pm
by Razgriz1
ok dude, just because he has an idea doesn't mean you can openly be an asshole. he had an idea, maybe it's been sugested befreo, if you know it has, tell him why it wasn't used don't just be a jerk and tell him its wrong and won't work.
and also, I thought about it, and I see the time issue you mention being tough, but one more thing, it also delays games that people have already been waiting to get into, I know how annoying it is to wait for days for that last two people to show up, and it would just delay even further. but other than that, I like it, I see how it would add a whole new level of stratigy to the game.

Posted:
Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:44 pm
by dominationnation
Razgriz1 wrote:ok dude, just because he has an idea doesn't mean you can openly be an asshole. he had an idea, maybe it's been sugested befreo, if you know it has, tell him why it wasn't used don't just be a jerk and tell him its wrong and won't work.
and also, I thought about it, and I see the time issue you mention being tough, but one more thing, it also delays games that people have already been waiting to get into, I know how annoying it is to wait for days for that last two people to show up, and it would just delay even further. but other than that, I like it, I see how it would add a whole new level of stratigy to the game.
what are you talking about. It will work. Im for the idea. It has just been susgested before. It is clear on the top of this fourm that there is a to o list. This guy isnt a n00b (unlike you) and shoul of known better than to post without checking it. I was also vvery polit. I told him that it was a good idea but has already been susgested. If you have a probablem with me then maby we should take this to flame wars.