Conquer Club

what about a game that you can attack through your own armies?

to make large armies more mobile.

No. Never. Not a chance. NO!

No - that is exactly the sort of thing that would close the gap between good and bad players - takes tactics to know where to put armies.

radclirr wrote:what about a game that you can attack through your own armies?

And would you do this in the real world if you were a General?

*Shoot that guy sergeant! He's in our way!*
But sir, that's one of ours.
*I don't give a damn, he's slowing us down!*

BANG!

not trying to be mean but that is the dumbest idea I have ever heard

trackersdream wrote:not trying to be mean but that is the dumbest idea I have ever heard

I 2nd that.... and ask the poster of this thread to go shoot himself or learn how to play the game if ur large armies are blocked that means u r stupid and u blocked them always put them infront

Could have benefited from some positive criticism. Thought this was a think tank, not a slaughterhouse.

What if you had the option to attack through yourself once or twice in a game?

Furthurmore if anyone is interest in kicking my retard ass you can find me in 395599 pw rambo

It just doesn't make sense. It takes some of the strategy and luck out of it. You have to say to yourself "Okay, he has guys there, but I'm surrounding him, so I need to place X many guys to take him out, I will then place the rest over here, so I can take those guys out." Otherwise, it's just "Guys go here! I stuck! I attack through myself!" Besides, fortification kind of covers that doesn't it?

i can see why this has been suggested, but it simply takes away the advantage from those players who deploy there armies in places which makes them available.

What happens when your own dice screw you over?

also, do you get a card for attacking yourself? or do you have to attack someone else..
its just a really retarded idea

no card

Sometimes you don't see your own ideas, good or bad but other people can, this is the value of constructive criticism. Derrida states

“This [style] can be perceived only by the other. The idiom, if there is any, that by which one recognizes a signature, does not reappropriate itself, as paradoxical as that may seem. It can only be apprehended by an other, given over to the other. Of course, I may think I recognize myself, identify my signature or my sentence, but on the basis of an experience and of an exercise which I have undertaken in which I will have been trained as other, the possibility of repetition and thus imitation, simulacrum, being inscribed at the very origin of this singularity.”

Derrida, Jacques, cited in The Philosopher and the Writer in between Deleuze and Derrida, edited by Paul Patton and John Protevi

I think Unlimited Fortification has alread done enough in this area. It reduces required skill by a lot to be able to end your turn with all your armies exactly where you want them.

That is purely the dumbest idea I have ever heard. That is an attacking strategy and that is part of the game where you put people down.

mayby an option for xml? go to the forum called "map foundry" and try the stickys

chessplaya wrote:

trackersdream wrote:not trying to be mean but that is the dumbest idea I have ever heard

I 2nd that.... and ask the poster of this thread [b]to go shoot himself[/] or learn how to play the game if ur large armies are blocked that means u r stupid and u blocked them always put them infront

i think you mean get his own side to shoot him