Conquer Club

i think that on the score board instead of having it ranked highest score to lowest score it should be ranked highest score divided by games played to lowest score divided by games played. it would show who is better instead of who has built up the highest score over time.

so instead of having a guy with 3000 points and 100 games played being ranked above a guy with 2000 points and only 25 games it would be the other way around

2000/25=80
3000/100=30

this would show who has more skill rather then who has more points

2 on the scale

this has been suggested many times.

why hasnt it happened already then?

cause its a bad idea

and we like it how it is

But you must also consider the way points are calculated. So person with more points gains less points from victory then person with less points.

Blueoctober wrote:
2000/25=80
3000/100=30

why would you want a man with a lower score and less games played to outrank someone with a higher score and many more games played???