Page 1 of 2
Remove old posts [Bad Idea]
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:34 amby hecter
Maybe we should have it so that we have lets say a 20 page limit to the posts, because after that, they're all old and outdated. That way we dont have confusing and stupid shit like that petition to remove world 2.0
NVM! IT WAS A BAD IDEA! NOOOOOO!!!
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:36 amby boberz
so the longest thread is done for then
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:48 amby wicked
no
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:52 amby hecter
I said a 20 page limit, that means that if you want to keep a thread alive, you just make sure it doesn't go past the 20th page.
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:12 pmby boberz
oh sorry had a brain freeze misunderstood.
still disagree they could be useful for example in the map foundary qwerts map is being abandoned with the intetion of being reborn in a few months this will go many pages down the list but may be needed when iot comes to it.
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:18 pmby wicked
NO hecter. bad idea.
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:43 pmby hecter
the map foundery doesnt even have 20 pages, it only has ten
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:45 pmby hecter
not only does it only have ten pages, but on the tenth page they have things like "how bout a canandian map" and middle east and stuff. No wicked, good idea
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:45 pmby AK_iceman
No hecter, it is a bad idea.
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:47 pmby spinwizard
lol, no hectre...no hectre...no hectre
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:50 pmby hecter
*sigh* fine, people don't like my idea, so we will continue to have really old threads like that anti-world2.0 one popping up.
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:58 pmby AK_iceman
So, if there was a 20 page limit, you dont think that if somebody bumped a thread from the last page it would be the same situation we have going on now?
There will always be people who think it's funny to bump the oldest thread in a forum, and it will always cause confusion. Doesn't matter if it's from the 20th page or the 50th page, it's still old enough to not be a topic of conversation anymore and it will confuse people either way.
Thats why your idea would not work.
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:00 pmby spinwizard
IC it is funny...like the bumped rt 1 from april in the tourny section, ppl were posting there saying "i'm in 4 a rt"...or is it just my weird sence of humor...
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:44 pmby Wisse
nope
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:08 pmby spinwizard
not funny???
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:09 pmby Wisse
spinwizard wrote:not funny???
not a good idea XD
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:20 pmby spinwizard
oh ok
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:25 pmby Geographical
i support because then you can use that memory for updates!
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:28 pmby hecter
Thank you. Somebody who supports my idea.
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:31 pmby spiesr
No hector...
(Just had to bandwagon that)
Posted:
Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:51 pmby Caleb the Cruel
hecter wrote:Thank you. Somebody who supports my idea.
I like your idea too.
Posted:
Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:47 amby Jamie
I think a thread should be bumped when it falls off of page one. How many actually look at post beyond that.
Posted:
Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:13 amby Skittles!
Jamie wrote:I think a thread should be bumped when it falls off of page one. How many actually look at post beyond that.
I sure don't. Unless I'm extremely bored and want to go to a thread that I liked.
Posted:
Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:17 pmby lackattack
Jamie wrote:I think a thread should be bumped when it falls off of page one.
THE WORST IDEA EVER
Posted:
Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:19 pmby Ronaldinho
lackattack wrote:Jamie wrote:I think a thread should be bumped when it falls off of page one.
THE WORST IDEA EVER
LMFAO!!!! lack just opened up a can of STFU jamie ahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahaaahhahahaaha