Conquer Club

Please see game 7572060.

Game 7572060

There should be harsh recourse for blatant truce-breakers. All agreements should be binding. Liars should be subject to bannishment, no?

What use does the site have for individuals who would sacrifice their honor for a game?

I have played games of many types for 30 years and never seen such. Your word is your bond, no?

You asked for a truce with anyone on your first turn of the game--not exactly the most honorable way to play either now is it?

I wasted 5 minutes of my precious life reading that game chat. It tells me that you, Sir, are wrong. It's good for you that you can't get banned for hypocrisy, seeing how you unhonorably attacked red when your truce ended.

Have a nice game.

I'm willing to support this suggestion if you're willing to accept that you're a hypocrite

I love this!

there was a player busted as a multi at about the same time as you started life on cc. It was a player who made a c and a for secret alliance against other players because he was asking for truces from the first round and they did not follow it. It would be interesting 2 find out if you were that player?


edit sorry it wasnt a bust multi
[url]
viewtopic.php?f=239&t=125243[/url]

don't mess about with truces because they come back and bite you in the face.

Longhorn_99 wrote:Please see game 7572060.

Game 7572060

There should be harsh recourse for blatant truce-breakers. All agreements should be binding. Liars should be subject to bannishment, no?

What use does the site have for individuals who would sacrifice their honor for a game?

I have played games of many types for 30 years and never seen such. Your word is your bond, no?

I played this game for 10 year before conquerclub and it was taboo to even ask for a truce.I am still reluctant to enter into an all out truce and normally stick to border truces.
Anyway if you want to dance with the devil.Don't be surprised when he stabs you in the back.
Foe the loser I'd say.

I normally go to cheating and abuse for new additions to my foe list. What a pleasant surprise to find one in Suggestions. What a hypocritical whiner.

Thanks Bogan...my thots exactly....lol.

The use of "honor" is so hypocritical it makes me want to puke. Play team games if you want to gang up on people you puss.

I have definitely "Foed the loser", as suggested.

Really interested by some of the comments:

Is diplomacy not the key to long-run multi-player game success? Truces are taboo?

In my other games, the truce-breaker opens themselves to attack the moment they announce the truce is over. I'm new, so my sample may not be a good representation. I look forward learning what standard truce terms are. Even if I was misinformed, how is attacking someone who announced the truce was over similar to outright backstabbing?

Here is a quote from an experienced friend of mine (Woltato) regarding the game:

"That's about the most blatant backstabbing I've ever seen. Don't think you're out of it yet though. Plus I think red's screwed his chance of winning. Noone's gonna trust him to make any deals now espcially if you keep reminding them of his treachery."

Do most of you disagree?

Look forward to more edification...

2010-09-02 22:24:11 - Longhorn_99: Hello all. Enjoy!
2010-09-02 22:24:16 - Longhorn_99: RED, truce??
2010-09-02 22:25:01 - Longhorn_99: (in all territories with 2 or more troops)
2010-09-02 22:27:09 - Longhorn_99: Blue, I will also accept at truce with you on the same terms if you wish...
2010-09-02 22:27:17 - Longhorn_99: Whomever is first to accept.



---
\
im just going to foe you now and save me hurting your feelings in chat some day in the future.

Longhorn_99 wrote:I have definitely "Foed the loser", as suggested.

Really interested by some of the comments:

Is diplomacy not the key to long-run multi-player game success? Truces are taboo?

In my other games, the truce-breaker opens themselves to attack the moment they announce the truce is over. I'm new, so my sample may not be a good representation. I look forward learning what standard truce terms are. Even if I was misinformed, how is attacking someone who announced the truce was over similar to outright backstabbing?

Here is a quote from an experienced friend of mine (Woltato) regarding the game:

"That's about the most blatant backstabbing I've ever seen. Don't think you're out of it yet though. Plus I think red's screwed his chance of winning. Noone's gonna trust him to make any deals now espcially if you keep reminding them of his treachery."

Do most of you disagree?

Look forward to more edification...

I have foed you becuase I doubt you are truly a Longhorn. This truly, is diabolical misrepresentation of the facts.

army of nobunaga wrote:2010-09-02 22:24:11 - Longhorn_99: Hello all. Enjoy!
2010-09-02 22:24:16 - Longhorn_99: RED, truce??
2010-09-02 22:25:01 - Longhorn_99: (in all territories with 2 or more troops)
2010-09-02 22:27:09 - Longhorn_99: Blue, I will also accept at truce with you on the same terms if you wish...
2010-09-02 22:27:17 - Longhorn_99: Whomever is first to accept.



---
\
im just going to foe you now and save me hurting your feelings in chat some day in the future.

Wait....are you back now?

just here to increase my foe list... thats all. not on the forums really

Queen_Herpes wrote: This truly, is diabolical misrepresentation of the facts.

Hilarious! Please let me know how you think I've misrep'ed facts...

Hilarious I wish I was in on that game....

army of nobunaga wrote:just here to increase my foe list... thats all. not on the forums really

Welcome back AoN Missed you.

Now onto this suggestion. It has been said before, and i'll say it again. Breaking a truce in a game is not against the rules in any way shape or form. If we were going to ban EVERY single player on this site that ever broke a truce, for some reason im key word "I", think there would be a LOT less members here then there would be.

The foe button is there for a reason. If you come across someone that you don't like how they play the game, or how they post in the forums, you can use it. This suggestion for banning "truce-breakers" won't be implemented.

Isn't this why we have rating's of players? The words "cheap tactics" if you have an issue comes to mind....

No change is needed, rate them how you feel and if you REALLY are upset add to foe and warn others with the rating.

Done.

I'm moving this to Rejected.

TheForgivenOne wrote:I'm moving this to Rejected.

Are you being honest?

Queen_Herpes wrote:

TheForgivenOne wrote:I'm moving this to Rejected.

Are you being honest?

Okay, you made me look to make sure I didn't move it into Implemented.