Page 1 of 1
Play Order suggestion.

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:38 pm
by Contrickster
1. Sequential = fixed order (A then B then C etc...)
2. Freestyle = any order (ABC CBA BAC etc...)
3. Stepped = rolling order (ABCDE, BCDEA. CDEAB etc...)
Is there any reason why #3 isn't a play order option?
I've not thought about the implications of it enough to know it would be a great suggestion. However I was surprised to find this suggestion was not on the list.
Great site!


Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:45 pm
by Master Bush
But who's A and who's B and so on? I dont see how random order doesn't work?

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:54 pm
by Anarkistsdream
A is the first person on the list, B the second, and so forth...
I like the idea of adding more variations, as well.

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:01 pm
by Scorba
Unless I'm missing something this suggestion just involves someone missing a turn every now and then.

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:05 pm
by Anarkistsdream
They wouldn't miss the turn, their turn would just revolve, so eventually you would go at the end... No one would ever miss one...
ABCDE
BCDEA
CDEAB
DEABC
EABCD
ABCDE

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:07 pm
by Master Bush
Yea, but whoever is A would be screwed at the start of the game.

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:08 pm
by Anarkistsdream
Still, it would add variety... Maybe not many people would use... Hell, I don't even think <b>I</b> would use it... But the more options you have, the less repetitive the gaming.

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:11 pm
by Master Bush
Winning never gets repetitive.

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:12 pm
by Anarkistsdream
Well, bro, for the losers out there- cough, me, cough- it would be nice...
As I said, I doubt I would use it, but I love playing Devil's Advocate.

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:29 pm
by spiesr
People would join it not knowing what it is and we would have enough questions/compliants to start a forum just for them...

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:32 pm
by Genghis Khant
Scorba wrote:Unless I'm missing something this suggestion just involves someone missing a turn every now and then.
That is basically what will happen. Rubbish idea. Forget about it.

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:38 pm
by Anarkistsdream
Genghis Khant wrote:Scorba wrote:Unless I'm missing something this suggestion just involves someone missing a turn every now and then.
That is basically what will happen. Rubbish idea. Forget about it.
So you're gonna bash people who come up with new ideas...?
I don't understand the negativity. The dude just was trying to contribute to a great site.

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:04 pm
by AndyDufresne
I'd have to agree, it may be interesting, but it would cause more confusion than we would want to handle.
--Andy

Posted:
Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:07 pm
by Anarkistsdream
And I have no problem with that... I merely had a problem with how briskly and rudely people brushed it off. We should all be more respectful of peoples suggestions.

Posted:
Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:06 pm
by Contrickster
Sorry, the more I think about it the better the suggestion sounds.
No turns are lost. Count them... ABCDE BCDEA = 2 turns each
What happens in sequential games is there is an unfair advantage to going first.
I want to remove that advantage. With Stepped Order everyone gets to go first.
If you don't want to play a game like that you don't have to choose it as an option.

Posted:
Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:53 pm
by nyg5680
it sound sintrestng i would try it

Posted:
Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:07 pm
by AndyDufresne
Contrickster wrote:...What happens in sequential games is there is an unfair advantage to going first...
I think you've got it backward! In going first in Sequential, most always, you don't have an advantage. There is a little more risk in trying to get a card. Say if you are the Fourth to go, there is most likely going to be an easy card somewhere.
--Andy

Posted:
Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:28 pm
by AAFitz
kind of like the end of a night at a bar...far more opportunities...