Conquer Club

Tournament organisers get a medal for every tournament they run and the count is not capped at 30.

This will improve things... for tournament organisers such as Blitzaholic, HighlanderAttack, etc. as it will show exactly how much time and effort they have put into CC, represent true figures, increase medal count, inflate egos etc.

A trivial matter maybe but please vote and post feedback.

Cheers, JB

[afterthought]How about working the tournament medals in a similar way to other medals?

Organise 10 - Bronze Medal
Organise 25 - Silver Medal
Organise 50 - Gold Medal
Oragnise 100 - Special Contribution Medal

Or something on those lines?[/afterthought]

I know HA doesn't care about medals, and I'm sure that goes for these others as well

more importantly, medals are supposed to be for playing and winning games, not running tourneys, this would ruin people's achievements on the board, they would be completely overshadowed by TO's with hundreds of medals. Also, people would just run a ton of tourneys for the medals, which would increase the number of tourneys in the create/join forum, and the TD's say there are already too many, and it would decrease the quality of the tourney's run

I'm sure there are other problems which I'm not thinking of right now, such as technichal server things (I'm definitely not a computer genius)

I agree, with an exception: increment follow-on medals by 10 (or some number well higher than one)

After the first 30 tournaments, ten more needed to get another medal. This way, TO's have some time before having to give out extra medals.

As for the post about "too many tournaments" - how can there really be "too many" if people are enjoying them?

Maybe the problem is the current standard "a medal for every tournament up to 30" is too much - maybe the exception idea I had should be started earlier; like, get a medal for running a tournament, sure... then the number doesn't change until 10 are reached, and an extra increment for every ten thereafter. That way, someone who's run 70 tournaments gets recognized, but it decreases the amount of medals the TO's have to award, so if getting extra medals does increase the number of tournaments, overall workload for TO's doing the awarding, is still less.

How about working the tournament medals in a similar way to other medals?

Organise 10 - Bronze Medal
Organise 25 - Silver Medal
Organise 50 - Gold Medal
Oragnise 100 - Special Contribution Medal

Cheers, JB

JoshyBoy wrote:How about working the tournament medals in a similar way to other medals?

Organise 10 - Bronze Medal
Organise 25 - Silver Medal
Organise 50 - Gold Medal
Oragnise 100 - Special Contribution Medal

Cheers, JB

Won't work... There will only be a giant inflation of tournaments with minimum requirements.

Gilligan wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:How about working the tournament medals in a similar way to other medals?

Organise 10 - Bronze Medal
Organise 25 - Silver Medal
Organise 50 - Gold Medal
Oragnise 100 - Special Contribution Medal

Cheers, JB

Won't work... There will only be a giant inflation of tournaments with minimum requirements.

Up the requirements.

I believe it is wrong to reward Tournament Organisers with medals for the first 30 tournaments then saying "You're not getting any more", after that.

It's not... what's the word...?

Ah yes... fair. It's not fair. Then again, CC isn't why don't we roll some "random" dice to determine the outcome of this?

Gilligan wrote:
Won't work... There will only be a giant inflation of tournaments with minimum requirements.

So what, if members are joining and enjoying them?

JoshyBoy wrote:I believe it is wrong to reward Tournament Organisers with medals for the first 30 tournaments then saying "You're not getting any more", after that.

It's not... what's the word...?

Ah yes... fair. It's not fair. Then again, CC isn't why don't we roll some "random" dice to determine the outcome of this?

A big reason is that after 30, Roman Numerals won't fit on the medal.

stahrgazer wrote:

Gilligan wrote:
Won't work... There will only be a giant inflation of tournaments with minimum requirements.

So what, if members are joining and enjoying them?

TD's find it too much work.

We need new, fresh, fun blood in CC's TD Team. I'll join if you guys need a hand.

Gilligan wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:I believe it is wrong to reward Tournament Organisers with medals for the first 30 tournaments then saying "You're not getting any more", after that.

It's not... what's the word...?

Ah yes... fair. It's not fair. Then again, CC isn't why don't we roll some "random" dice to determine the outcome of this?

A big reason is that after 30, Roman Numerals won't fit on the medal.

That's why I suggested Bronze, Silver, and Gold medals.

Even if you award it at the TDs' discretion.

stahrgazer wrote:As for the post about "too many tournaments" - how can there really be "too many" if people are enjoying them?

I don't think there are too many, there are many other threads debating this topic mostly in the general discussion part of the tourney forum.

JoshyBoy wrote:

Gilligan wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:How about working the tournament medals in a similar way to other medals?

Organise 10 - Bronze Medal
Organise 25 - Silver Medal
Organise 50 - Gold Medal
Oragnise 100 - Special Contribution Medal

Cheers, JB

Won't work... There will only be a giant inflation of tournaments with minimum requirements.

Up the requirements.

no, people (including me) like to play in quick, small tourneys, plus if you up the requirements then people will just barely meet the new min. requirements, you can't up the requirements (and keep more than a couple of tourneys running) enough to get rid of this problem.

The tourney medals are ok, the only thing I would change is MAYBE give people one trophy for every 3 or 5 tourneys after they reach the 30 mark just to recognize people who run a ton of tourneys

Regardless of everything else CC, you must realise that just now, from you guys, it's like "30 tournament medals? Great, Now piss off. We aren't giving you any more recognition, motivation, or reward for running tournaments on our site."

Something needs to change, and we're all happy to work with you to find something new and exciting to do with the medals system for tournaments.

How about - 30 Tournament Medals, then a Special Recognition or Contribution medal for running say a total of 60, then 100, and then 150.

Something like that.

Cheers, JB

JoshyBoy wrote:Regardless of everything else CC, you must realise that just now, from you guys, it's like "30 tournament medals? Great, Now piss off. We aren't giving you any more recognition, motivation, or reward for running tournaments on our site."

Something needs to change, and we're all happy to work with you to find something new and exciting to do with the medals system for tournaments.

How about - 30 Tournament Medals, then a Special Recognition or Contribution medal for running say a total of 60, then 100, and then 150.

Something like that.

Cheers, JB

I agree. If you spend enough time and energy into this site to create 30 tournys, you deserve something. Even if after 3, you wont get a medal until 35, then 45, then 60, etc, there should still be some recognition.. Just my opinion.
I would still run tournys without getting any medals, but there are some people that wont... And after 30 tournys, those players have probably gotten pretty good at running a tourny, but now they wont... Just my 2 cents

iamkoolerthanu wrote:I would still run tournys without getting any medals, but there are some people that wont... And after 30 tournys, those players have probably gotten pretty good at running a tourny, but now they wont... Just my 2 cents

If people are only running tournaments for the medals, then they probably aren't worth having after 30 anyway.


I'm wholeheartedly against both the suggestion for more tournament medals and the suggestion of JoshyBoy as TD.

Night Strike wrote:I'm wholeheartedly against both the suggestion for more tournament medals and the suggestion of JoshyBoy as TD.

Ouch.

Night Strike wrote:I'm wholeheartedly against both the suggestion for more tournament medals and the suggestion of JoshyBoy as TD.

Why?

JoshyBoy wrote:Regardless of everything else CC, you must realise that just now, from you guys, it's like "30 tournament medals? Great, Now piss off. We aren't giving you any more recognition, motivation, or reward for running tournaments on our site."

I remember the good ol' days when tournaments were run and joined for the fun, not for the medals.

The great TO's who run all these tournaments (Blitz, HA, Bart, etc) will be the first to tell you they don't do it for the medals. So it sounds like they have plenty of motivation to keep going already.

Bones2484 wrote:

JoshyBoy wrote:Regardless of everything else CC, you must realise that just now, from you guys, it's like "30 tournament medals? Great, Now piss off. We aren't giving you any more recognition, motivation, or reward for running tournaments on our site."

I remember the good ol' days when tournaments were run and joined for the fun, not for the medals.

The great TO's who run all these tournaments (Blitz, HA, Bart, etc) will be the first to tell you they don't do it for the medals. So it sounds like they have plenty of motivation to keep going already.

Just to clarify, I run them for fun and for other people to enjoy. The medals are a bonus. Besides, I'm a long way off 30.