1756259711
1756259711 Conquer Club • View topic - Manual Ordering needs to be random...
Page 1 of 1

Manual Ordering needs to be random...

PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:07 pm
by yeti_c
Concise description: Make Manual Ordering random

Specifics: The current Manual Order of play isn't random - it is based on who "places" first... This can benefit the last person to join the game - as they can lay first.

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • Reinstate random order of play.
  • Give no advantage to laying first (you can't see the enemy troops so there is no disadvantage)

Re: Manual Ordering needs to be random...

PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:09 pm
by jammyjames
yeti_c wrote:Concise description: Make Manual Ordering random

Specifics: The current Manual Order of play isn't random - it is based on who "places" first... This can benefit the last person to join the game - as they can lay first.

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • Reinstate random order of play.
  • Give no advantage to laying first (you can't see the enemy troops so there is no disadvantage)


also freestyle needs to be sorted... someone misses a turn and is still given another 12 hours to take their next before you... its bollokcs

Re: Manual Ordering needs to be random...

PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:15 pm
by yeti_c
jammyjames wrote:also freestyle needs to be sorted... someone misses a turn and is still given another 12 hours to take their next before you... its bollokcs


I'm not sure what you mean - Can I suggest you create a "BUG" for this one - as it sounds like a bug - this is more of a suggestion.

(The management like everything to be in distinctive places - and adding it here might muddy the waters!)

C.

Re: Manual Ordering needs to be random...

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:47 am
by K-dub
clearly this serves no purpose...are you wanting an order of deploying troops? it doesnt matter who deploys manual troops because there is ? all over the board nomatter if you are first or last to deploy....it should stay as it is...gives everybody the same time to deploy and gets it done sooner!

i have to give this a thumbs down

Re: Manual Ordering needs to be random...

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:05 am
by nippersean
Yeti,

Are you saying that who lays down first in manual gets to go first?
Is this true for sequential and / or freestyle?

Re: Manual Ordering needs to be random...

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:06 am
by yeti_c
nippersean wrote:Yeti,

Are you saying that who lays down first in manual gets to go first?
Is this true for sequential and / or freestyle?


Yes...

C.

Re: Manual Ordering needs to be random...

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:07 am
by yeti_c
K-dub wrote:clearly this serves no purpose...are you wanting an order of deploying troops? it doesnt matter who deploys manual troops because there is ? all over the board nomatter if you are first or last to deploy....it should stay as it is...gives everybody the same time to deploy and gets it done sooner!

i have to give this a thumbs down


Clearly you know f*ck all about what you're on about... read the thread before attempting to think next time.

C.

Re: Manual Ordering needs to be random...

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:55 am
by ManBungalow
I see how this could affect freestyle games, but in just the same way most non-manual freestyle games are biased towards the last to join (first to play).

As for sequential, I don't think I understand.
Game 5598531 - first to deploy plays first
Game 5598595 - first to deploy plays second

Re: Manual Ordering needs to be random...

PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:39 am
by yeti_c
ManBungalow wrote:I see how this could affect freestyle games, but in just the same way most non-manual freestyle games are biased towards the last to join (first to play).

As for sequential, I don't think I understand.
Game 5598531 - first to deploy plays first
Game 5598595 - first to deploy plays second


Weird - the 2 8 player games that I've played with deployment - have both had the same person who laid first play first...

On another note - that second game looks very suspicious - the loser didn't actually bother attacking?!

C.