Grouping

by **unriggable** on Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:57 am

So now we've got two WW2 maps, anybody else think Battle For Australia should be renamed so the two WW2 maps are next to eachother, you know, for easier organization?

by **Kaplowitz** on Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:13 am

That's a good idea, this should be in the Main Foundry

by **gimil** on Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:24 am

quench

by **Coleman** on Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:30 am

While that is a Map Idea, it isn't a map. I don't see a working draft. Your discussion confuses and infuriates me. You need to take it to pm. [-X

by **Kaplowitz** on Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:35 am

Coleman wrote:While that is a Map Idea, it isn't a map. I don't see a working draft. Your discussion confuses and infuriates me. You need to take it to pm.

Coleman, they could make you a mod!

by **Coleman** on Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:36 am

Kaplowitz wrote:Coleman, they could make you a mod!

My 'civil disobedience' is probably going to get me burned soon. I'm so annoyed though. It's something I'm willing to get burned for.

Anyway, I think Lack was planning on a better way to organize the maps soon, as we are starting to have quite a few of them.

by **unriggable** on Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:55 am

Coleman wrote:I don't see a working draft.

Alright, boner.

by **Coleman** on Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:04 am

Yes! Thailand would be awesome!

by **KEYOGI** on Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:11 pm

Thread moved to a more appropriate forum. Am I abusing my mod powers Coleman? Maybe I should've asked your permission first. :roll:

by **AK_iceman** on Wed Aug 01, 2007 5:00 pm

unriggable wrote:So now we've got two WW2 maps, anybody else think Battle For Australia should be renamed so the two WW2 maps are next to eachother, you know, for easier organization?

I don't see what the big deal is. Why do we have to group the WW2 maps together?

In case you were wondering, I vote no. To everything.

Grouping

Grouping

Re: Grouping

Who is online