Conquer Club

Suggestion: Foe List alteration

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Your thoughts

This is a good option pi, may your next lover taste like chocolate coated strawberries
12
80%
This is stupid pi, you are an idiot, and your children's children are bound for mediocrity
2
13%
Once again pi, you skirt the thin line between flaming, trolling, and genuine posting. Bravo sir!
1
7%
 
Total votes : 15

Suggestion: Foe List alteration

Postby e_i_pi on Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:31 pm

Concise description:
  • Foe list should probably have tick-box setting of what you want foe'd

Specifics:
  • Tick box for joining games
  • Tick box for forums

Comments
I use the foe list for two reasons: either the foe is a douche when playing, or they're a douche when posting. As much as I'd like to foe every self-aggrandising arsewipe on the forums, that unfortunately leaves me in a bit of a pickle in tournaments and the clan league when I'm teamed up against them. Personally, I don't see the problem at all, but apparently we all have to get along or some such, I dunno, I just work here.

Example A: Scott-Land does nothing but talk shit while pulling his own dick. I do not want to have to read his blathering diatribe. I am more than happy to entertain him in league and tournament games though.

Example B: colton is an incompetent cook who will never get beyond 1000 points. Mind you, I find his posts funny, or rather, I find him getting flamed funny. I do not wish to play with or against him, but I do want to be able to see the chain of events that has led to his arse getting handed to him on the forums.

You can see the quandary I'm in
User avatar
Captain e_i_pi
 
Posts: 1775
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:19 pm
Location: Corruption Capital of the world

Re: Suggestion: Foe List alteration

Postby TheBro on Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:35 pm

Couldn't decide between #1 or #3.

But indeed a very good idea. I have nobody on my foe, but I'm sure people who use the foe would really like this!
No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn.
Colonel TheBro
 
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: The dark side of the moon.

Re: Suggestion: Foe List alteration

Postby Artimis on Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:04 pm

I like this idea, it has been suggested before though. I mention this for reference only and not to invalidate this thread.

Subject: Suggestion: Ignore/foe list change
==================================================
This post was sponsored by Far-Q Industries.

Far-Q Industries: Telling you where to go since 2008.
User avatar
Captain Artimis
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:09 am
Location: Right behind ya!!! >:D

Re: Suggestion: Foe List alteration

Postby colton24 on Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:20 pm

e_i_pi wrote:Concise description:
  • Foe list should probably have tick-box setting of what you want foe'd

Specifics:
  • Tick box for joining games
  • Tick box for forums

Comments
I use the foe list for two reasons: either the foe is a douche when playing, or they're a douche when posting. As much as I'd like to foe every self-aggrandising arsewipe on the forums, that unfortunately leaves me in a bit of a pickle in tournaments and the clan league when I'm teamed up against them. Personally, I don't see the problem at all, but apparently we all have to get along or some such, I dunno, I just work here.

Example A: Scott-Land does nothing but talk shit while pulling his own dick. I do not want to have to read his blathering diatribe. I am more than happy to entertain him in league and tournament games though.

Example B: colton is an incompetent cook who will never get beyond 1000 points. Mind you, I find his posts funny, or rather, I find him getting flamed funny. I do not wish to play with or against him, but I do want to be able to see the chain of events that has led to his arse getting handed to him on the forums.

You can see the quandary I'm in


this is great...........except for the....flame/watever that is against me
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Mr. Squirrel wrote:
pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed :mrgreen:

One fool reporting for duty!

Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class colton24
 
Posts: 1935
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:27 am
Location: Alabama

Re: Suggestion: Foe List alteration

Postby Timminz on Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:12 am

This leads to the ever-present question. Is calling someone a fucking moron considered a flame if they are, in fact, a fucking moron?
User avatar
Captain Timminz
 
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Location: At the store

Re: Suggestion: Foe List alteration

Postby Artimis on Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:14 am

Timminz wrote:This leads to the ever-present question. Is calling someone a fucking moron considered a flame if they are, in fact, a fucking moron?


I take the point of view that it's only slander if it isn't true. Likewise, if you're telling the truth when you call someone 'a fucking moron' then you're just stating facts, not trying to provoke an emotional response.
==================================================
This post was sponsored by Far-Q Industries.

Far-Q Industries: Telling you where to go since 2008.
User avatar
Captain Artimis
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:09 am
Location: Right behind ya!!! >:D

Re: Suggestion: Foe List alteration

Postby oVo on Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:59 am

You were used as an example and not toasted colon.

Slander is spoken and libel is written.
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: Suggestion: Foe List alteration

Postby TheBro on Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:23 am

Timminz wrote:This leads to the ever-present question. Is calling someone a fucking moron considered a flame if they are, in fact, a fucking moron?


Depends who posts it.
No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn.
Colonel TheBro
 
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: The dark side of the moon.

Re: Suggestion: Foe List alteration

Postby MeDeFe on Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:16 pm

colton24 wrote:
e_i_pi wrote:Concise description:
  • Foe list should probably have tick-box setting of what you want foe'd

Specifics:
  • Tick box for joining games
  • Tick box for forums

Comments
I use the foe list for two reasons: either the foe is a douche when playing, or they're a douche when posting. As much as I'd like to foe every self-aggrandising arsewipe on the forums, that unfortunately leaves me in a bit of a pickle in tournaments and the clan league when I'm teamed up against them. Personally, I don't see the problem at all, but apparently we all have to get along or some such, I dunno, I just work here.

Example A: Scott-Land does nothing but talk shit while pulling his own dick. I do not want to have to read his blathering diatribe. I am more than happy to entertain him in league and tournament games though.

Example B: colton is an incompetent cook who will never get beyond 1000 points. Mind you, I find his posts funny, or rather, I find him getting flamed funny. I do not wish to play with or against him, but I do want to be able to see the chain of events that has led to his arse getting handed to him on the forums.

You can see the quandary I'm in

this is great...........except for the....flame/watever that is against me

He said he likes having you in the fora, that's hardly a flame.

I also like the suggestion. Separate lists for people you don't want to play and people whose posts you don't want to read would be great.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.


Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users