Conquer Club

Standard Service TImes

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Standard Service TImes

Postby hulmey on Tue Sep 02, 2008 12:53 am

My suggestion is that MODS answer e-tickets within a stipulated time limit

Concise description:
Standard Service TImes

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
This will make customer's feel like something is being done and that will make them really happy, giving them a warm fuzzy feeling
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Standard Service TImes

Postby Mr Changsha on Tue Sep 02, 2008 2:31 am

Agreed. I sent an e mail to Twill regarding a friend of mine who had been completely banned from the site (I felt unfairly as he hadn't cheated but merely point dropped a few hundred points) and three weeks later I have yet to receive a response.

Fruitcake wrote well about standards of customer service a couple of days ago. His point was well made and you would think should be blindingly obvious to a business in the 21st century.

Mr C
User avatar
Colonel Mr Changsha
 
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:42 am

Re: Standard Service TImes

Postby blakebowling on Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:21 am

usually, you get an answer within 2-3 days, if your ticket is relevant (your friend that got banned should have sent the ticket, not you)

however, due to 'staff adjustment' (only way to put it nicely) the people who had been answering e-tickets are now doing a lot more work (not that I'm defending them ;))
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: Standard Service TImes

Postby lancehoch on Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:35 am

Mr Changsha wrote:Agreed. I sent an e mail to Twill regarding a friend of mine who had been completely banned from the site (I felt unfairly as he hadn't cheated but merely point dropped a few hundred points) and three weeks later I have yet to receive a response.

Fruitcake wrote well about standards of customer service a couple of days ago. His point was well made and you would think should be blindingly obvious to a business in the 21st century.

Mr C

Along with what blake said, Twill had been away for about a month and still has about 200 messages in his inbox.
Sergeant lancehoch
 
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: Standard Service TImes

Postby hulmey on Tue Sep 02, 2008 3:29 pm

lancehoch wrote:
Mr Changsha wrote:Agreed. I sent an e mail to Twill regarding a friend of mine who had been completely banned from the site (I felt unfairly as he hadn't cheated but merely point dropped a few hundred points) and three weeks later I have yet to receive a response.

Fruitcake wrote well about standards of customer service a couple of days ago. His point was well made and you would think should be blindingly obvious to a business in the 21st century.

Mr C

Along with what blake said, Twill had been away for about a month and still has about 200 messages in his inbox.


Doesnt mean anything to me! This is a suggestion not lets defend CC thread!
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Standard Service TImes

Postby blakebowling on Tue Sep 02, 2008 3:59 pm

hulmey wrote:
lancehoch wrote:
Mr Changsha wrote:Agreed. I sent an e mail to Twill regarding a friend of mine who had been completely banned from the site (I felt unfairly as he hadn't cheated but merely point dropped a few hundred points) and three weeks later I have yet to receive a response.

Fruitcake wrote well about standards of customer service a couple of days ago. His point was well made and you would think should be blindingly obvious to a business in the 21st century.

Mr C

Along with what blake said, Twill had been away for about a month and still has about 200 messages in his inbox.


Doesnt mean anything to me! This is a suggestion not lets defend CC thread!

and I'm telling you that your suggestion was implemented long ago, before it was suggested.
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: Standard Service TImes

Postby cena-rules on Tue Sep 02, 2008 4:21 pm

blakebowling wrote:
hulmey wrote:
lancehoch wrote:
Mr Changsha wrote:Agreed. I sent an e mail to Twill regarding a friend of mine who had been completely banned from the site (I felt unfairly as he hadn't cheated but merely point dropped a few hundred points) and three weeks later I have yet to receive a response.

Fruitcake wrote well about standards of customer service a couple of days ago. His point was well made and you would think should be blindingly obvious to a business in the 21st century.

Mr C

Along with what blake said, Twill had been away for about a month and still has about 200 messages in his inbox.


Doesnt mean anything to me! This is a suggestion not lets defend CC thread!

and I'm telling you that your suggestion was implemented long ago, before it was suggested.

well what a crappy job cc are doing of it. Shouldnt surprise me really
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
User avatar
Lieutenant cena-rules
 
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Chat

Re: Standard Service TImes

Postby blakebowling on Tue Sep 02, 2008 4:33 pm

cena-rules wrote:
blakebowling wrote:
hulmey wrote:
lancehoch wrote:
Mr Changsha wrote:Agreed. I sent an e mail to Twill regarding a friend of mine who had been completely banned from the site (I felt unfairly as he hadn't cheated but merely point dropped a few hundred points) and three weeks later I have yet to receive a response.

Fruitcake wrote well about standards of customer service a couple of days ago. His point was well made and you would think should be blindingly obvious to a business in the 21st century.

Mr C

Along with what blake said, Twill had been away for about a month and still has about 200 messages in his inbox.


Doesnt mean anything to me! This is a suggestion not lets defend CC thread!

and I'm telling you that your suggestion was implemented long ago, before it was suggested.

well what a crappy job cc are doing of it. Shouldnt surprise me really

I never said the solution was working ;)
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1


Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users