Conquer Club

A new way of winning [rejected]

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

A new way of winning [rejected]

Postby jakejake on Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:01 am

perhaps a new way of winning could be: owning 66% of the map


some problems could be:

that some maps wouldnt be fair/good with this idea...
starting positions could give a very unfair advantage...
theres probably many more but if people give feedback that would be good :D

this is probably a crap idea and someone may have suggested it before, but i forgot to look throught - sorry!!
User avatar
Private 1st Class jakejake
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:31 am
Location: england baby!

Postby DiM on Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:09 am

1. use the form
2. crap idea.
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Postby yeti_c on Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:52 am

DiM wrote:1. use the form
2. crap idea.


Spot on as ever DiM...

Of course you could've also pointed out - that you could make a map to do this already...

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Postby Plutoman on Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:00 pm

DiM wrote:1. use the form
2. crap idea.


Gotta agree with that.

In a game with flat rate cards, and a decent drop, first person with a mixed set could go crazy and take the territories needed.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Plutoman
 
Posts: 566
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 4:28 pm

Postby wcaclimbing on Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:06 pm

doodle earth:
you would only have to kill 12 countries :roll:


AoR Might, Magic, and Feudal Wars:
those maps are huge.... that is a ton of neutrals to kill.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class wcaclimbing
 
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.

Postby jakejake on Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:35 pm

thats why i said it would only work on some maps....i knew it was a shit idea but i just wanted some other points of view!! :lol:
User avatar
Private 1st Class jakejake
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:31 am
Location: england baby!

Postby jakejake on Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:00 pm

thinking about it now...>> its such a shit idea!! with hindsight - its just an easier way of winning :roll:
User avatar
Private 1st Class jakejake
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:31 am
Location: england baby!

Postby TaCktiX on Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:20 pm

You could advocate more objective maps that had that as the objective, but making that a generic victory option is just stupid, as you have agreed.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class TaCktiX
 
Posts: 2392
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:24 pm
Location: Rapid City, SD

Postby Herakilla on Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:21 pm

would have to restricted to maps geared toward it. for example like you said many things would make it unfair but what about escalating games? ive seen people come back from having nothing to winning
Come join us in Live Chat!
User avatar
Lieutenant Herakilla
 
Posts: 4283
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism

Postby jakejake on Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:39 pm

i think we can rule this 1 out!! ah well - worth a try...lol :lol:
User avatar
Private 1st Class jakejake
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:31 am
Location: england baby!

Postby Coleman on Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:19 pm

I'd support this if the win condition was 2/3 of all the owned territories. Then neutrals owning stuff wouldn't matter.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby Risktaker17 on Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:28 pm

I would say it has to be at least 75% of terrs
Highest place: 40 1/17/08
Highest point total: 2773 1/17/08
Top Poster Position: 97th
User avatar
Captain Risktaker17
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:09 am

Postby cicero on Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:30 pm

Maybe just a 1/4 ?
So, in a 4 player game, if you went first you'd win ?
User avatar
Sergeant cicero
 
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: with the infected neutrals ... handing out maps to help them find their way to CC

Postby Twill on Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:35 pm

I'm going to reject this one.

It can be done on a map by map basis with objectives but would just be a lottery on other maps (Like doodle earth) where the first person to go could pretty easily win.

Thanks for the suggestion - but rejected :)

Twill
Retired.
Please don't PM me about forum stuff any more.

Essential forum poster viewing:
Posting, and You! and How to behave on an internet forum...on the internet
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Twill
 
Posts: 3630
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:54 pm


Return to Archived Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users