Moderator: Clan Directors
chemefreak wrote:chapcrap wrote:Please josko, we're looking to the future at this point. Punishment for this is not going to happen. We are looking at future drops.
Well, maybe we should vote in CDF to see how TOFU should be punished...
A. No punishment.
B. Clan Ban (12 months).
C. Castration.
Just a thought.
chapcrap wrote:chemefreak wrote:chapcrap wrote:Please josko, we're looking to the future at this point. Punishment for this is not going to happen. We are looking at future drops.
Well, maybe we should vote in CDF to see how TOFU should be punished...
A. No punishment.
B. Clan Ban (12 months).
C. Castration.
Just a thought.
Yeah, go ahead and do that, but put up things that aren't stupid. C is not a real choice and B is over the line.
chemefreak wrote:chapcrap wrote:chemefreak wrote:chapcrap wrote:Please josko, we're looking to the future at this point. Punishment for this is not going to happen. We are looking at future drops.
Well, maybe we should vote in CDF to see how TOFU should be punished...
A. No punishment.
B. Clan Ban (12 months).
C. Castration.
Just a thought.
Yeah, go ahead and do that, but put up things that aren't stupid. C is not a real choice and B is over the line.
I'm not serious. The decision has been made. I thought it was funny. Sigh.
Keefie wrote:Are TOFU having a laugh ???? Within a few days of withdrawing from CL5 citing player shortages, they announce the signing of three new clan members
Chariot of Fire wrote:TOFU reluctantly withdraws from CL5 as the commencement date of 2nd June would mean the clan could not meet the tourney requirements.
josko.ri wrote:I would question truth of this statement because 15 TOFU old members (excluding the 3 new recruits) started new games or are assigned to waiting-to-start games during last one week. This is fact that everyone can very easy check if I told truth or lie. And minimum requirements for CL5 are only 10 players.
I just corrected untrue facts into true facts, no other point of my post.
sjnap wrote:Sigh, i dont even bother to read and reply to your post anymore. To much blablabla bs.
Twisting and turning, turning and twisting.
You spent way to much time on CC.
You simply dont get it huh. Go mind your own business and stir up in your own threads.
Dako wrote:josko.ri wrote:I would question truth of this statement because 15 TOFU old members (excluding the 3 new recruits) started new games or are assigned to waiting-to-start games during last one week. This is fact that everyone can very easy check if I told truth or lie. And minimum requirements for CL5 are only 10 players.
I just corrected untrue facts into true facts, no other point of my post.
Your clan mate sjnap worded a perfect reply for me:sjnap wrote:Sigh, i dont even bother to read and reply to your post anymore. To much blablabla bs.
Twisting and turning, turning and twisting.
You spent way to much time on CC.
You simply dont get it huh. Go mind your own business and stir up in your own threads.
josko.ri wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:TOFU reluctantly withdraws from CL5 as the commencement date of 2nd June would mean the clan could not meet the tourney requirements.
I would question truth of this statement because 15 TOFU old members (excluding the 3 new recruits) started new games or are assigned to waiting-to-start games during last one week. This is fact that everyone can very easy check if I told truth or lie. And minimum requirements for CL5 are only 10 players.
I just corrected untrue facts into true facts, no other point of my post.
josko.ri wrote:Dako wrote:josko.ri wrote:I would question truth of this statement because 15 TOFU old members (excluding the 3 new recruits) started new games or are assigned to waiting-to-start games during last one week. This is fact that everyone can very easy check if I told truth or lie. And minimum requirements for CL5 are only 10 players.
I just corrected untrue facts into true facts, no other point of my post.
Your clan mate sjnap worded a perfect reply for me:sjnap wrote:Sigh, i dont even bother to read and reply to your post anymore. To much blablabla bs.
Twisting and turning, turning and twisting.
You spent way to much time on CC.
You simply dont get it huh. Go mind your own business and stir up in your own threads.
This thread is business of the whole clan world.
My comments here are related to the topic and to my opinion that clan should not be allowed to participate in event with higher game load than it has the one they withdrew from at the same time.
Clan world does not deserve that you fool them by saying lie information about your players (un)availability when your players normally join other games.
eddie2 wrote:josko what happened to this ?????
22:59:04 he's agreed not to post anything more vs cof/tofu in public
22:59:12 whether or not he follows it, idk
22:59:22 but I think if tofu doesnt either, he might not
they said nothing towards you so why start again![]()
josko.ri wrote:eddie2 wrote:josko what happened to this ?????
22:59:04 he's agreed not to post anything more vs cof/tofu in public
22:59:12 whether or not he follows it, idk
22:59:22 but I think if tofu doesnt either, he might not
they said nothing towards you so why start again![]()
I do not see how your comment contributed to this discussion nor how is it related to topic.
ljex wrote:josko.ri wrote:eddie2 wrote:josko what happened to this ?????
22:59:04 he's agreed not to post anything more vs cof/tofu in public
22:59:12 whether or not he follows it, idk
22:59:22 but I think if tofu doesnt either, he might not
they said nothing towards you so why start again![]()
I do not see how your comment contributed to this discussion nor how is it related to topic.
I do not see how your comment contributed to this discussion nor how is it related to topic.
josko.ri wrote:ljex wrote:josko.ri wrote:eddie2 wrote:josko what happened to this ?????
22:59:04 he's agreed not to post anything more vs cof/tofu in public
22:59:12 whether or not he follows it, idk
22:59:22 but I think if tofu doesnt either, he might not
they said nothing towards you so why start again![]()
I do not see how your comment contributed to this discussion nor how is it related to topic.
I do not see how your comment contributed to this discussion nor how is it related to topic.
I put 2 comments in this topic, and both were on topic. One was correcting lie statement said by other person and that statement is related to topic of this thread (and I wrote in the reply that the only point of my post is to correct lie statement), and another one was also very related to topic of this discussion, about (not) allowing clans to participate at the same time in competitions with higher game load than competition they withdrew from.
Chariot of Fire wrote:josko.ri wrote:ljex wrote:josko.ri wrote:eddie2 wrote:josko what happened to this ?????
22:59:04 he's agreed not to post anything more vs cof/tofu in public
22:59:12 whether or not he follows it, idk
22:59:22 but I think if tofu doesnt either, he might not
they said nothing towards you so why start again![]()
I do not see how your comment contributed to this discussion nor how is it related to topic.
I do not see how your comment contributed to this discussion nor how is it related to topic.
I put 2 comments in this topic, and both were on topic. One was correcting lie statement said by other person and that statement is related to topic of this thread (and I wrote in the reply that the only point of my post is to correct lie statement), and another one was also very related to topic of this discussion, about (not) allowing clans to participate at the same time in competitions with higher game load than competition they withdrew from.
I am sick of your accusations regarding truthful statements that you claim to be lies. You simply will not stop haranguing our clan and you seize upon every opportunity to contradict something someone has said when in truth you can neither prove nor disprove anything. You simply do it to be annoying. I am reporting your post because this ceaseless baiting of TOFU and its members has to cease.
Chariot of Fire wrote:You use the terms 'exact argument' and 'pure argument' very liberally, when in reality all you are doing is making a supposition which is not fact-based at all. Who knows better who will be available for the duration of a tournament; you or the clan that is in possession of all the facts? The TO has already accepted our clan's withdrawal from CL5 and that is the end of the matter. I have no idea why you relentlessly pursue this topic and try to 'prove' that TOFU's withdrawal was unnecessary. What is the point, and what do you hope to gain? The only reason I can see is that you wish to discredit the clan and its members, and it is for this reason that your post was reported.
Of course that clan of possession of all the facts knows better, but it is possible that that clan is possessing one facts as a real reasons for withdrawing but telling to clan world other facts just to make themselves looking better. I think that may be reality with TOFU's case
josko.ri wrote:Great, very reasonable ruling, and more important ruling which follows present rules and common sense.
Dako wrote:Great, very reasonable ruling, and more important ruling which follows present rules and common sense.
Thank you Nicky. Should we discuss dropping of events here or in CDF?
I see many of you are discussing about should clan who drop out be punished for not participating in next year competition which will start several months or one year after current competition.
But, I think people who are discussing about it do not consider more important issue, should those clans be allowed to enter/play in ongoing clan competitions, not in clan competitions that will happen sometimes in future.
If a clan cannot commit to play in one competition, then how the same clan at the same time can commit to play in another competition which has higher game load?
I do not say penalize withdrawing clan for lifetime or for next competitions (if they provide evidence that they recruited some new members), but I say eliminate them from all ongoing competitions which have equal or higher game load than competition which they withdrew from. If a clan cannot have commitment for example for 16 new games every 2 weeks, isn't it paradoxal to allow them to compete at the same time in another competition which has for example 20 new games every 2 weeks?
If the clan for future events recruit new players and be again able to compete, then allow them to enter, but at the same time of withdrawing one competition, the clan should not be allowed to play in another competition which has higher game load.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users