WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

by **Qwert** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 6:48 pm

Nikolai do you belive that i work these map for 20 skiled map makers? Do you see numbers of present vote over 100 people vote, these wath i call majority. These map work for ordinary people not for some couple of people who whant to be better then others members and to decide what its best for my map and what its not.
And ruben for you MAJORITY-ВЕЋИНА

by **Qwert** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 6:58 pm

Well i goo to sleep, im realy enjoy in discusion with all but its time for sleep, we continue tomorow ok.

by **Spockers** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:42 pm

If you want to post your pool, then hurry up and post it. just stop going on about it.

by **Samus** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:49 pm

Spockers wrote:If you want to post your pool, then hurry up and post it. just stop going on about it.

Andy has to remove the old one, and he might as well stick the new one up while he's at it so the options are fair and impartial.

by **badluck725** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:12 pm

can someone post an image of this map that actaully works, it looks sick in the small image but i want to actually see it

by **KEYOGI** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:18 pm

by **qeee1** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:27 pm

qwert, I honestly think if you do the blurring (and do it right) the map will be quenched.

I don't see any other suggestions for improvements. People do give their honest opinion in this thread, like you saw when people said the circles were fine. It's not some conspiracy, people do care about the blurring.

If you showed people a good map and they all said yes I want to play this map, does that mean you shouldn't make it into a great map?

by **AndyDufresne** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:31 pm

Do you play these map

yes, its wery nice map
82% [ 112 ]
no, i dont like these map
17% [ 23 ]

Total Votes : 135

--Andy

by **t.e.c** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:17 pm

hahaha!!

this thread is jokes. next poll please qwert.

by **Enigma** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:53 pm

Ok. I have one suggestion, and it will probably be ignored, shot down, and insulted, but I'll say it anyway.

I have never liked the shadows behind the continent names in the legend, but I realize now that the text wasn't the problem.

Rather, the shadows behind the coloured rectangles do not belong. Immediatly next to them are the helmet icons with the bonus numbers, and they do not have the 3D effect. So I think the 3D effect on the rectangles is out of place, it is not consistent. Leave the shadows under the actual text, and under the army bonus numbers.

Does this make sense?

I was having trouble with the 3D layered effect, but I realize now that this was because everywhere else on the map there are 2 layers- the text seems to float over the background, but on the legend there are suddenly 3 layers- the text floats over the rectangles which float over the background.

It is a very simple fix, simply remove the rectangles' shadows. Add to that the slight blur which others have mentioned, and this map will really be very nice.

by **sully800** on Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:16 pm

Eh, the helmets have a 3D effect (the shadow and shine) they just don't stand out as much as the numbers and font do. I don't think getting rid of the shadow will make things look better, just a bit simpler. However I think most people are pretty content with the legend.

by **Nikolai** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 1:11 am

No, qwert, I don't think that you work the map for the members of the foundry alone. But I'm wondering whether you really work the map for CC, or for you. If you work it for CC, why not take people's advice on how to make it as good for CC as possible? You working it for you would explain why you totally refuse to accept the opinions of anyone except yourself about what looks good and what doesn't.

by **hulmey** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:11 am

Nikolai u come in this this thread and started hurling insults left right and centre....If you want to comment here have the decenceny to read the 70 odd pages here..otherwise in ronaldinho terms GFY

Ok i had a couple of mates at my place today they looked at the map and said its fantastic we then got the microscope out and saw the jagged edges. But they said theres alot of pains in the arses on this site who should be shot and there bodies fed to my dogs. I mention no names.

Okey dokey back to GUISCARD'S example of blurring the borders..I am seeing in the right map that it seems to be more magnified than the map on the left...WHY IS THIS?????

by **t.e.c** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:29 am

its not the magnification that matters, thats just to show what was done, the important part is the normal size one and the one on the right looks better.

by **Skittles!** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:30 am

Woo, only 5 more pages. Come on people, we can make it to 80!

by **hulmey** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:52 am

yeah...we are all gonna go down in living CC memory....And Qwert is going to have a song named after him and go down in CC Folklore history

by **Samus** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:55 am

Skittles! wrote:Woo, only 5 more pages. Come on people, we can make it to 80!

You know, this thread already had the Foundry record a long ass time ago. The second longest was the World 2.0 map thread with 38 pages, we have long since schooled that weak sauce.

by **Ruben Cassar** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:23 am

Skittles! wrote:Woo, only 5 more pages. Come on people, we can make it to 80!

Of course we will. I predicted that around page 67 I think. And my third name is Nostradamus! :lol:

by **Skittles!** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:48 am

Ruben Cassar wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Woo, only 5 more pages. Come on people, we can make it to 80!

Of course we will. I predicted that around page 67 I think. And my third name is Nostradamus!

Well, I predicted page 100.

I wonder if Qwert will notice we are mocking about how long it's taking to finish a map. His map.

by **hulmey** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:44 am

who said we are mocking anybody skittles!!!

Its just abit of fun....Maps Foundry's very own Flame sections hehehehe

by **Qwert** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:49 am

Hulmey, i notice too, that Guiscard magnified these size more, strange, why he dont put to bee same size?

Never mine in vote poll i will put only normal size, becouse people dont play maps with 10 time biger map.

by **Qwert** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:56 am

oK I put vote poll, i belive that question is fair for all, and i not favorize not mine and i dont favorize Guiscard size, that i put only A and B,

by **Contrickster** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 8:30 am

Great map!

Difference between A and B is barely noticable but given a choice I'd go for the smoothed borders.

by **AndrewB** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:34 am

Actually qwert,

I've realized one inconsistency.

If you spell everything from Russian names (like Lvov and Kiev), then proper name is Ternopol, not Ternopil. Ternopil is Ukrainian spelling.

by **Qwert** on Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:45 am

No Andrew all names are english translation, what i find in wikipedia. And if you remember people vote for english names.

WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

image

Who is online