Conquer Club

not really. It's definitely far less offensive than your avatar.

PG13

have you ever seen a porno dagip?

if not, check one out, then come back to that thread, look at those photos, and then you tell me?

I mean good grief, you can go to any local beach and see women in bikinis more than what you see here, is a women in a swimsuit with a thong porn? I mean you are whacked out.

DaGip wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=34666&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=105

Its not porn if the twins are still in the cage

Wow, sorry Gip that we may take away from your continuous blathering of completely unsubstantiated idiocy...

Nope, not one of those posts is 'prono' by this site's standards.

Was there a particular image that you objected to btw?

Blitzaholic wrote:have you ever seen a porno dagip?

if not, check one out, then come back to that thread, look at those photos, and then you tell me?

I mean good grief, you can go to any local beach and see women in bikinis more than what you see here, is a women in a swimsuit with a thong porn? I mean you are whacked out.

Dagip=queer.

reverend_kyle wrote:Dagip=queer.

QFL

reverend_kyle wrote:Dagip=queer.

and virgin

dagip youre a dumbfuck.

how is that porn?
a porn pic , by defenition, would be a pic that shows nipples, vagina or an asshole. ( or a penis ) None of the pics posted in that topic display any of the forbidden parts, so...that thread is ligid.

-ShadySoul- wrote:how is that porn?
a porn pic , by defenition, would be a pic that shows nipples, vagina or an asshole. ( or a penis ) None of the pics posted in that topic display any of the forbidden parts, so...that thread is ligid.

what about dudes nipples? why are those not considered porn?

just wondering?

-ShadySoul- wrote:how is that porn?
a porn pic , by defenition, would be a pic that shows nipples, vagina or an asshole. ( or a penis ) None of the pics posted in that topic display any of the forbidden parts, so...that thread is ligid.

You'll forgive me if I post a different "defenition".

1. Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.
2. The presentation or production of this material.
3. Lurid or sensational material: "Recent novels about the Holocaust have kept Hitler well offstage [so as] to avoid the ... pornography of the era" (Morris Dickstein).

pornography. (n.d.). The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Retrieved November 27, 2007, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pornography


Not that I think the pictures in question are pron but I don't understand the reaction to someone who might perceive these pictures as "lurid".

edwinissweet wrote:

-ShadySoul- wrote:how is that porn?
a porn pic , by defenition, would be a pic that shows nipples, vagina or an asshole. ( or a penis ) None of the pics posted in that topic display any of the forbidden parts, so...that thread is ligid.

what about dudes nipples? why are those not considered porn?

just wondering?

iunno...good question.

-ShadySoul- wrote:how is that porn?
a porn pic , by defenition, would be a pic that shows nipples, vagina or an asshole. ( or a penis ) None of the pics posted in that topic display any of the forbidden parts, so...that thread is ligid.

agreed with shady here

let me give you a few other examples:

MTV or VHI videos have often showed women with g-strings or thongs and breats, nips covered, none are viewed as porn, any beach you go to, you will se women with butts revealed but some floss in there, again, not porn, art pictues and art history and sculptures show nudity, it is not considered porn and sports illistrated, one of americas most popularized magazines has a swimsuit editon, some show nips through fish net clothing and thong all the time, again, not porn. all those pics or photos were not even close to any of these examples and these examples are accepted by most, and yes 13 year olds buy these magazines and watch these video's.


breif nudity is not porn, but cc being liberal as they say, cant pick and choose what is liberal, they must draw a line, the line i understand is no penis, vagina, nipples, anus hole. i understand sexual arousal but the line gets blended and vague there as many cross the line in many areas in life and is accepted, demonstrated in examples i gave above. one could say they may become sexually arosed by looking at a beautiful women on canvas that is considered art to some people, now ones gets aroused, it is considered porn? i don't think so, must be careful here, there is a fine line.


cheeks and breast or most of breast is brief nudity and rated PG or PG 13 in films. sports illlistrated who reveals women pretty well is not porn, hustler is porn, see the difference?


my 2 cents

To quote the Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart:

"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description [hard-core pornography]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that. " Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964)

3. The test for obscenity is "whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to prurient interest." Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 . Pp. 191-195.

Our community has different standards than the PTA, your church group, etc.

Of course this precedent does not apply to Canada

No, it's not porn.