Page 1 of 1
Pekarka and UnderSeage [noted]

Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:34 am
by nvwinelover
These are suspected Secret Alliance
Suspect users: Pekarka and UnderSeage
Game number:
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=958688
Comments: Have not attempted to break each others bonuses the entire game have been more than willing to attack the other two players. Plus green will listen to blue when he says something in the post without hesitation. I have played in hundreds of games and this is very odd game play to which I have not seen before. Please look at this game as it is very fishy in here. I am willing offer more detail if you want but for now i will let you look into.
Thanks for everything you guys do!
NV
<enter your name here>

Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:12 am
by hecter
Ya, they're like, way far away from each other, you look like you have the potential for a TON of bonuses, they're both next to you, and blue has only said two things the whole game...
Besides, if they were multis, why would blue bother giving himself instructions though game chat? Same with a secret alliance. Why would he bother announcing his instructions?

Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:12 am
by Vincent M
thats bullshit I know him personally
he is no multi
no sir

Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:59 am
by UnderSeage
im no multi everyone who knows me will back me up...as for your accusation of me never breaking his bonus actually i did...look in the game log and ull see i attacked gordonville from him about half way through the game messing up his bonus....plus he lives in serbia and im a born and raised american. next time u wanna make an accusation check the facts

Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:51 pm
by nvwinelover
I never said you were a multi. I said you formed a secret alliance with him which is possible even if he lives in Serbia. Learn to read the posts!
You guys have been working together for days to take over the map and becaue you make one move (which secret alliances do on occasion to avoid detection) does not change the fact you are working together to make sure you are the final two players.
If its not true then they won't find anything. So stop sweating it and getting so defensive.
I have been accused before and they researched it and decided we didn't form an alliance. If what you are saying is true they will find the same for you. But i am skeptical in your case.
f*ck

Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:54 pm
by UnderSeage
you're a douche plain and simple. this is completely false. its a good thing your name is winelover because at least that explains the drunken stupidity.
Re: f*ck

Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:59 pm
by Herakilla
UnderSeage wrote:you're a douche plain and simple. this is completely false. its a good thing your name is winelover because at least that explains the drunken stupidity.
flame wars ---> that way

Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 9:21 pm
by sully800
Thanks hera...
Anyway, this is noted, but you'll need to provide evidence from multiple games to show that its a repeating pattern in order to deserve a block.
thanks sully

Posted:
Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:35 pm
by nvwinelover
Thanks Sully!
I wanted to make sure it was noted in case another player ran into the same problem with them. I have blocked him and don't plan on playing him again.
Re: thanks sully

Posted:
Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:36 pm
by sully800
nvwinelover wrote:Thanks Sully!
I wanted to make sure it was noted in case another player ran into the same problem with them. I have blocked him and don't plan on playing him again.
Yep, that's why threads like this are good when it comes to a secret alliance. If someone else is suspicious about these players in the future and searches the forum they will see your thread....and that will provide a good amount of evidence.