Conquer Club

These are suspected Multis

Suspect users: Corman , Ballin-231

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=755099
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=696050
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=696051
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=696764
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=696766

Comments: I found that it was very Weird that that most of the time during the game they were ownly seconds apart. Also the amount of games together in such a very small period of time and that the same player keeps on winning.
please correct me if i am wrong

Might I refer you Here

Me and Ballin-231 are nothing under the ordinary, we are just very good friends who ocasionally like to enjoy a couple of rds. of 1 vs. 1

NOTE: IF we really were multis would'nt ya think there would always be one decisive winner in each of the games were in? There is never a clear winner because like i said we are just friends who like playing against each other and occasionally join bigger games but we don't cheat and like the rule states if we're an alliance we say it

* i am sorry to others who think ballin-231 is the same person as me Corman but i can assure you we're not*

Corman wrote:Me and Ballin-231 are nothing under the ordinary, we are just very good friends who ocasionally like to enjoy a couple of rds. of 1 vs. 1

NOTE: IF we really were multis would'nt ya think there would always be one decisive winner in each of the games were in? There is never a clear winner because like i said we are just friends who like playing against each other and occasionally join bigger games but we don't cheat and like the rule states if we're an alliance we say it

* i am sorry to others who think ballin-231 is the same person as me Corman but i can assure you we're not*

thats funny, in my game against you two, after i was dead from your alliance, ballin missed just enough turns for you to win.... strange, but if the mods dont care then i dont either, whatever...

I found it stange that they could have two games created in a peroid of 2 seconds because i am running a tourney and i can't do that

Tk 421 wrote:I found it stange that they could have two games created in a peroid of 2 seconds because i am running a tourney and i can't do that

It's quite easy to start 10-20 similar games in a few seconds.

Thank you Alstergreen!!!!!!!

There's no doubt that in game 755099 hwhrhett got screwed by a secret alliance.

I recommend that no premium member that wants a fair game should initiate a 3 (or even 4) player public game. When doing so, you attract these sorts of "buddies" all the time.

cleveridea wrote:There's no doubt that in game 755099 hwhrhett got screwed by a secret alliance.

I recommend that no premium member that wants a fair game should initiate a 3 (or even 4) player public game. When doing so, you attract these sorts of "buddies" all the time.

want an even more obvious one, look at the game that japan jeff just played against those two.

Corman was previously busted, and upgraded to premium for what its worth.

But we have 3 seperate people in different games claiming these two are multis in feedback. And from everything I've seen those accusations are correct.

Corman , Ballin-231 are busted

why are these idiots allowed to continue playing in games? and you make a request about it and you get an email saying that they are busted. big deal! they can still come in and ruin games. so WTF???? i enjoy playing here, but it's getting old between the cheaters and the deadbeats. i had a game a while back, suspected they were multi's got confirmation that they were and then a bout a week later, i get a message saying that they aren't. WTF??? and in between i get their idiot kid brother, or another of their multi nics in a game and they promise to do everything in their power so that i don't win. like i said before CC needs to set it up so that when you start a game, you can limit the rank of the people you want to play in your game. the ignore list only works so far.

Multi Kill score : 3!

sully800 wrote:Corman was previously busted, and upgraded to premium for what its worth.

But we have 3 seperate people in different games claiming these two are multis in feedback. And from everything I've seen those accusations are correct.

Corman , Ballin-231 are busted

If Corman was busted again then why is he still allowed to start new games?

Game number is 791130 for reference

TeeGee wrote:

sully800 wrote:Corman was previously busted, and upgraded to premium for what its worth.

But we have 3 seperate people in different games claiming these two are multis in feedback. And from everything I've seen those accusations are correct.

Corman , Ballin-231 are busted

If Corman was busted again then why is he still allowed to start new games?

Game number is 791130 for reference

that is a very good question, lol

Corman upgraded to premium once again which is why he is still playing (I have to admit, I didn't think that was possible).

In any case, he came clean to me that he was not a multi, but instead was forming secret alliances with his brother (on an account using the same computer, so its essentially the same thing). Therefore the previous punishment stands.

Thanks for the explanation sully

Corman is still going on my ignore list just in case..he's done it twice now, so in my books can't be trusted.

and this monkey tries to tell me he's not a multi. "a secret alliance" with his brother? oh please, that's just to funny. wonder which one of the idiots make the move.

japan_jeff wrote:and this monkey tries to tell me he's not a multi. "a secret alliance" with his brother? oh please, that's just to funny. wonder which one of the idiots make the move.

seriously, brothers that play from the same computer and play as a team in singles games...... thats still a multi in my book.

hwhrhett wrote:

japan_jeff wrote:and this monkey tries to tell me he's not a multi. "a secret alliance" with his brother? oh please, that's just to funny. wonder which one of the idiots make the move.

seriously, brothers that play from the same computer and play as a team in singles games...... thats still a multi in my book.

what gets me is that he gets the "multi hunter" to believe his story.

o.k. i'm gonna start an account with my wife and play in singles games with her. but we're not going to have any "alliances".

this is the second time that this has happened to me. first time the "hunter" sent me a message to my registered email saying that they were in fact multi's. then a few days later i got another email saying my neg feedback was being removed because it wasn't factual. i said that they were proven multi's by the "hunter". then they're back in cc after telloing the story my wife and i play but we have no alliances.

cheaters suck. not as bad as the dead beat newbies, because there aren't as many. but they still suck!

japan_jeff wrote:what gets me is that he gets the "multi hunter" to believe his story.

The punishment didn't change, so it doesn't really matter if I believe he was a multi or secret alliance former in this case. I do believe him but the result was the same.

Also for those concerned, I believe Corman was originally just blocked with someone else, and upgraded to premium on his own after the fact. He was then busted here and bought a new premium to keep playing.

hmmm.. funny how immediately after he was busted here two new users joined that play almost 100 percent of their games with corman.....

get krunk
and getr done

here are some interesting games:

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=808685#gmtop
this one is a three player game with corman and get krunk where it is obvious that they are pretty much only fighting the poor third player.

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=808652#gmtop
this one is a freestyle game where they always take their turns immediately one after the other, but never at the same time.....



ALL of his games with these fellows play out like these... he is probably not a multi, but he needs to know he cant just have his friends join singles games that he is in and team up on people like that.

too suspicious....

bump

bump, lol