Conquer Club

Subject line: m.asher//bucknut33 secret alliance


These are suspected Secret Alliance

Suspect users: m.asher and bucknut33

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=619313

Comments: check the chat out. speaks for its self

thanks,
NewMercy

Ummm..........there's no secret there.

maybe I am missing something.... are you saying they had a secret alliance before they talked about it in the game chat?

Yes...they were going head to head so I moved out of the way....then...neither attacked eachother... odd.... not until the game chat revealed the "truce was off!"

Truce...what truce???

NewMercy wrote:Yes...they were going head to head so I moved out of the way....then...neither attacked eachother... odd.... not until the game chat revealed the "truce was off!"

Truce...what truce???

He didn't say the truce was off.

"2007-07-12 05:23:53 - Bucknut33: green, if you move out of N America I won't attack you in S America or Africa...a one turn warning if the truce is to end. deal?"

That was his proposition for the truce and the conditions under which it could end.

The fact that they didn't attack the round before making the truce doesn't prove that a truce was pre-existing. And since Bucknut DID ask for a truce I don't think the claim holds water.

m.asher and bucknut33 are cleared.

Oh my gosh! The game chat has mysteriously been altered...or should I use the pc term edited. In my previous message I quoted word for word what the game chat said "or the truce is off" The game chat did not say "a one time warning" This isn't even their vocabulary. Further evidence of this would prove why I asked in the game chat "truce?" This revelation more of an issue than the first. Let's see if my wording gets altered or edited as well. What a joke!