Page 1 of 1

Tim Woodbury [es]

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 5:18 pm
by 11Joan11
see chat in game 16777292

Accused:Tim Woodbury

xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Severe PM Abuse
Other: foul language. Rediculous moves in favor of Raspberry



Game number(s):16777292




Comments:

Re: Tim Woodbury

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 5:38 pm
by BIG_John
11Joan11 wrote:see chat in game 16777292

Accused:Tim Woodbury

xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Severe PM Abuse
Other: foul language. Rediculous moves in favor of Raspberry



Game number(s):Game 16777292






Comments:



Fixed the links for player and game.

Re: Tim Woodbury

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 6:58 pm
by TimWoodbury
you had a major lead in deployment holding both NA and SA so i broke your bonus you went back thus giving the game to rasberry had you not went and invaded me then red wouldnt of won.

Re: Tim Woodbury

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 8:17 pm
by Frox333
just foe and move on

Re: Tim Woodbury

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 9:12 pm
by Serbia
TimWoodbury wrote:you had a major lead in deployment holding both NA and SA so i broke your bonus you went back thus giving the game to rasberry had you not went and invaded me then red wouldnt of won.


So you admit you intentionally threw the game?

Re: Tim Woodbury

PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 6:27 am
by clangfield
Serbia wrote:
TimWoodbury wrote:you had a major lead in deployment holding both NA and SA so i broke your bonus you went back thus giving the game to rasberry had you not went and invaded me then red wouldnt of won.


So you admit you intentionally threw the game?


How do you translate that into game-throwing? That's not what he said at all.

Re: Tim Woodbury

PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 6:41 am
by TimWoodbury
Serbia wrote:
TimWoodbury wrote:you had a major lead in deployment holding both NA and SA so i broke your bonus you went back thus giving the game to rasberry had you not went and invaded me then red wouldnt of won.


So you admit you intentionally threw the game?


Nope he had most troops most droo si i broke his bonus to stop him getting further ahead.

Re: Tim Woodbury

PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:46 am
by Barney Rubble
More to the point .........That kind of chat towards a woman ? Really big boy ? Must be making you feel real manly ?
The mods may have more of a case for that part of the complaint
BR

Re: Tim Woodbury [es]

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:24 am
by iAmCaffeine
I find it funny when bad players call other bad players bad.

Re: Tim Woodbury [es]

PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:55 am
by MrBoom
Yeah, Tim, from the chat it's obvious you're a cunt

Re: Tim Woodbury [es]

PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 6:04 pm
by Evil Semp
11Joan11 wrote:Other: foul language. Rediculous moves in favor of Raspberry


The language in the chat would be a FAMO. Foe And Move On.

Just because someone doesn't make the moves that you want or think they should doesn't violate any rules. I think your moves in trying to eliminate the accused helped Raspberry win the game. This is CLEARED.

Re: Tim Woodbury [es]

PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 6:04 pm
by Evil Semp
Cleared

Re: Tim Woodbury [es]

PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 7:53 pm
by BIG_John
I think the language in the game chat was part of the report as well.

Re: Tim Woodbury [es]

PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 8:45 pm
by Serbia
BIG_John wrote:I think the language in the game chat was part of the report as well.


And the language earned a FAMO. They won't do anything about that type of talk.

Re: Tim Woodbury [es]

PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 10:37 pm
by BIG_John
For some reason I was thinking there was something worse in there but just read back through it and realized I have seen worse that got FAMO. So that was my bad.