Page 1 of 1
sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:30 am
by Metsfanmax
Accused:
sabotage2016_sabotage_shickingbritsThe accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Comments:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=218778IcePack wrote:What is your original username? Posting from a new one means I can't do anything with the info and run it up the food chain.
sabotage2016 wrote:Icepack
_sabotage_
Re: sabotage2016 multi

Posted:
Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:41 am
by sabotage2016
Missed a spot:
Icepack
_sabotage_
Can't even log in.
Re: sabotage2016 multi

Posted:
Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:49 am
by Metsfanmax
Who cares if you can log in to those other accounts? You were banned on them, you're going to be banned on this one too.
Re: sabotage2016 multi

Posted:
Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:56 am
by sabotage2016
I wasn't banned on _sabotage_
Better become a better stalker if you are going to bother.
Re: sabotage2016 multi

Posted:
Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:01 pm
by Metsfanmax
sabotage2016 wrote:I wasn't banned on _sabotage_
Yes, you were. I was the one
who reported you, I think I would remember. The fact that you bought premium to become unguested doesn't somehow erase the past.
Re: sabotage2016 multi

Posted:
Tue Jun 14, 2016 4:10 pm
by IcePack
The Admin know about the issue / issues as of this morning.
Edit for Admin:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=218778
Re: sabotage2016 multi

Posted:
Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:22 pm
by king achilles
Busted.
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:47 am
by Metsfanmax
He's back as
whoelsescewed

Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:49 am
by whoelsescewed
Busted:
A guy who we were charging to play and whose account we had prevented access to. We stopped him from using his account so he couldn't address the fact that we were stealing his money.
He was forced to use a "multi" account so he could address the fact that we had charged him four times after he did everything he could to prevent the site from charging him.
He isn't in fact a multi, because we blocked his other account, but we want to shut him up, and we were so very pleased to do so.
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:00 pm
by iAmCaffeine
You re a multi. However, the larger issue for me is that if one is locked out of their account for whatever reason, how are they supposed to cancel the automatically recurring payments, assuming CC don't oblige requests?
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:03 pm
by riskllama
iAmCaffeine wrote:You re a multi. However, the larger issue for me is that if one is locked out of their account for whatever reason, how are they supposed to cancel the automatically recurring payments, assuming CC don't oblige requests?
this.
say it aint so, big perm!!!
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2016 5:53 am
by Dukasaur
iAmCaffeine wrote:You re a multi. However, the larger issue for me is that if one is locked out of their account for whatever reason, how are they supposed to cancel the automatically recurring payments, assuming CC don't oblige requests?
Users who are locked out of their accounts can still file an eticket to take care of such things.
riskllama wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:You re a multi. However, the larger issue for me is that if one is locked out of their account for whatever reason, how are they supposed to cancel the automatically recurring payments, assuming CC don't oblige requests?
this.
say it aint so, big perm!!!
It aint so.
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:48 am
by mrswdk
Dukasaur wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:You re a multi. However, the larger issue for me is that if one is locked out of their account for whatever reason, how are they supposed to cancel the automatically recurring payments, assuming CC don't oblige requests?
Users who are locked out of their accounts can still file an eticket to take care of such things.
So what of sabotage's claim that he filed e-tickets and got nowhere?
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:42 am
by Metsfanmax
I have no reason to trust sabotage whatsoever (neither of his old accounts are premium so I find it hard to believe that CC is still charging him for premium), but it would be nice to hear confirmation from an admin on whether the recurring payment is cancelled if you are busted and stripped of premium.
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:22 am
by riskllama
a good idea to put consumer minds @ ease, i would think.
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2016 1:25 pm
by iAmCaffeine
Metsfanmax wrote:I have no reason to trust sabotage whatsoever (neither of his old accounts are premium so I find it hard to believe that CC is still charging him for premium), but it would be nice to hear confirmation from an admin on whether the recurring payment is cancelled if you are busted and stripped of premium.
He did have premium at times though.
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:47 pm
by BGtheBrain
My previous insider knowledge is that the busting of an account DOES NOT deactivate their recurring subscription.
It may have changed since I was a MH years ago, but change is typically slothlike on this website.
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:46 pm
by riskllama
BGtheBrain wrote:My previous insider knowledge is that the busting of an account DOES NOT deactivate their recurring subscription.
It may have changed since I was a MH years ago, but change is typically slothlike on this website.
yeeaaahh...big wham should probably go ahead and change that.
like, this afternoon.
Re: sabotage2016 multi [ka]

Posted:
Sat Jun 18, 2016 5:14 am
by iAmCaffeine
BGtheBrain wrote:My previous insider knowledge is that the busting of an account DOES NOT deactivate their recurring subscription.
It may have changed since I was a MH years ago, but change is typically slothlike on this website.
That's what I'd assumed as well. Fair enough, you break the rules enough times you can't come back, but don't keep taking money from someone you've forbidden to play.