Page 1 of 1

Cocoa and Diotte12 (maybe Cocoa and others...)

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:16 pm
by BBoz
These are suspected of Secret Alliance.

Suspect users: Cocoa, Diotte12

Game number: (Multiple occurences)
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=398254
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=400482
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=404980
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=408331
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=411269


Comments: These two are also involved in many private games. But since those aren't public, no way to tell what the parties agreed to.

I looked into Cocoa because I was playing another game that included Uhtred. Uhtred made what seemed to be some unusual, not in his own best interest type of moves. (In a 3 player game, Uhtred came all the way across the game board to attack me when he had a much better setup and more control of countries on the other side of the map. He basically stripped those down to nothing and pummeled me with his armies while Cocoa took control of all the other countries "behind Uhtred".) So I started looking at prior games. Didn't see one where Uhtred and Cocoa had played before, but found many with Cocoa and Doitte12 that appear obvious that they are in a secret alliance. If you look at the game play in the above games, you will notice that early in the game Cocoa and Doitte12 never attack each other with any significance and wait until all other players are eliminated before they start to go after each other. In the most recent game listed above (411269) Doitte12 even comments that it's the first time she has played this game.

BBoz

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 7:41 pm
by Zepy12
being part of one of these games, I concur...it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck....

Zep

PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 12:23 am
by BBoz
Read an explanation in the last game for his unusual play, it being his kid he was playing with. I think about that and how it would vs. 2 people in a secret alliance. They would look about the same I think. 2 people playing games together and generally choosing not to attack each other.

If this guy's reason is true, he would be better off playing "Doubles" games or private games with his kid until they are ready to be in games where they really compete against each other like other opponents.

PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 4:46 pm
by Zepy12
i don't buy that explanation at all...it doesn't make sense...multiple accounts are not permitted...and if they are going to play w/multiple accounts they should be banned from playing w/one another in games...or in just doubles.

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 11:17 pm
by Cocoa
Hey you people just to let you all know I signed up as a member a while back and the games that Diotte12 (my son) and I play against one another now are in private games only. That is why they are private games so we can play against one another without others accussing us of anything. We do not play in public games together anymore and have not for a while now.