Gundula - Intentional deadbeat/abusive language [Clear] DCR

[gradybridges]

Accused:

Gundula

The accused are suspected of:
-Intentional deadbeat(missed turn)
-Abusive language
-future ratings abuse of me

Game number(s):

Game 12981887

Comments:
-The guy had a bad turn then in chat he said he would be deadbeating the rest of the game. He does
-calls me a pedophile(child groomer)
-Will leave me 1 ratings for nothing.

Text from chat

2013-07-14 18:20:21 - Gundula: hi and good luck mate
2013-07-14 18:35:53 - gradybridges: need it after this drop
2013-07-14 18:39:04 - Gundula: you got it, 12 to 3 and i lose 11 for 0
2013-07-14 18:39:37 - Gundula: sorry pal but i just dont play bullshit dice games like this one, i lost interest
2013-07-14 18:39:56 - gradybridges: you did ay good luck and it appears i git it
2013-07-14 18:49:32 - Gundula: true, stil typical cc bullshit so i will just deadbeat now.
2013-07-14 18:51:03 - gradybridges: and you'll get reported
2013-07-14 18:54:36 - Gundula: oh no, im so worried, you will ruin my life if you did that you fucking prick
2013-07-14 18:56:09 - gradybridges: you overattack and blame CC. learn to stop you had a huge edge and blew it
2013-07-14 18:56:23 - Gundula: Mr Gaybridges time you grew up and took life a little more serious instead of hiding behind a fucked up online rigged site, i bet your a groomer to children ??????
2013-07-14 18:57:18 - gradybridges: Says a sore loser.
2013-07-14 18:58:10 - gradybridges: who plays 2,000 + games on a "rigged" site
2013-07-14 18:58:22 - gradybridges: please take all the time you want to lose
2013-07-14 19:00:18 - Gundula: im not a sore loser im a realist
2013-07-14 19:01:23 - Gundula: i will take 24 hrs, please go and toss yourself off with the thought of gaining a few more points to boost your sad ego
2013-07-14 19:02:07 - Gundula: oh and of course you will get a shit nrating from me so i do hope you do the same
2013-07-14 19:06:58 - gradybridges: Thought so. To scared to actually deadbeat. Like I said take your time
2013-07-14 19:07:42 - gradybridges: 23 hours 59 min is fine by me
2013-07-14 19:11:18 - Gundula: thanks, i will,
2013-07-15 18:25:51 - Gundula: ====> ----- Dick Head

[Frox333]

agreed with gradybridges

[Jdsizzleslice]

I don't see the intentional deadbeat because he only missed one turn.

[deathcomesrippin]

Unfortunately, 1 rating will not justify a Ratings Abuse case. And just a quick glance of the Ratings he has left shows he is not really an abuser of the ratings system.

Also, his comments in chat are not enough to even touch on game chat abuse.

I would suggest FAMO, so that you never have to deal with this from him again.

Gundula is cleared of deadbeating, bigotry, game chat abuse, and ratings abuse.

[gradybridges]

A guy admits to shit in chat and then does and and you don't even note it. I won't even fucking bother with you guys anymore

[hmsps]

This is a total crock of shit ruling as usual.

If someone calls you a paedophile that is defamatory and is libelous. I personally think this should carry a warning just as saying someone is gay etc would do as its just as damaging.

This should be looked at by KA and the owner at the very least.

Also he calls him Mr GAYbridges

[Lindax]

This is a total crock of shit ruling as usual.

If someone calls you a paedophile that is defamatory and is libelous. I personally think this should carry a warning just as saying someone is gay etc would do as its just as damaging.

This should be looked at by KA and the owner at the very least.

Also he calls him Mr GAYbridges

You gotta see the logic hmsps:

Calling somebody a fag is wrong because it's ok to be gay.

Calling somebody a child groomer is ok because it's wrong to be a pedophile.

Get it now?

Lx

[hmsps]

This is a total crock of shit ruling as usual.

If someone calls you a paedophile that is defamatory and is libelous. I personally think this should carry a warning just as saying someone is gay etc would do as its just as damaging.

This should be looked at by KA and the owner at the very least.

Also he calls him Mr GAYbridges

You gotta see the logic hmsps:

Calling somebody a fag is wrong because it's ok to be gay.

Calling somebody a child groomer is ok because it's wrong to be a pedophile.

Get it now?

Lx

I can totally see your logic but my comments still stand. The site needs to send out clearer guidelines on what is and what is not acceptable. Either way in this case he calls him GAYbridges which i am sure is against the current guidelines,

[deathcomesrippin]

This is a total crock of shit ruling as usual.

If someone calls you a paedophile that is defamatory and is libelous. I personally think this should carry a warning just as saying someone is gay etc would do as its just as damaging.

This should be looked at by KA and the owner at the very least.

Also he calls him Mr GAYbridges

You gotta see the logic hmsps:

Calling somebody a fag is wrong because it's ok to be gay.

Calling somebody a child groomer is ok because it's wrong to be a pedophile.

Get it now?

Lx

I can totally see your logic but my comments still stand. The site needs to send out clearer guidelines on what is and what is not acceptable. Either way in this case he calls him GAYbridges which i am sure is against the current guidelines,

hmsps is correct in this case. I did not see the misspelled name in the chat. The case will be re-opened, and because I am such a good fella, I will even get a few more opinions on this topic from the other mods.

As for the groomer comment and the rest of the complaint, they are all cleared and closed.

[Lindax]

This is a total crock of shit ruling as usual.

If someone calls you a paedophile that is defamatory and is libelous. I personally think this should carry a warning just as saying someone is gay etc would do as its just as damaging.

This should be looked at by KA and the owner at the very least.

Also he calls him Mr GAYbridges

You gotta see the logic hmsps:

Calling somebody a fag is wrong because it's ok to be gay.

Calling somebody a child groomer is ok because it's wrong to be a pedophile.

Get it now?

Lx

I can totally see your logic but my comments still stand. The site needs to send out clearer guidelines on what is and what is not acceptable. Either way in this case he calls him GAYbridges which i am sure is against the current guidelines,

I was actually being a wee bit sarcastic.

Lx