Conquer Club

Accused:

jamalelc


The accused are suspected of:

Other: abusing rating system

Game number(s):

Game 8734847

Comments: Suicided me for no good reason in game, i hardly said anything, then he gives me 1-1-1 with the tags Talkative, Paranoid, Sore Loser, Poor Strategy. Seen he's done the same to other people so I thought I'd report it.

this is getting past being funny to many people are reporting for severe rating abuse. do you guys even know what that is ??????

ok your rating could possibly be because of this comment.

2011-04-06 10:57:07 - nuls: Yeah, I dont think grey knows how to play reallt.

this opens up a reason for him to rate you bad. Also severe means constantly rating bad if you look at his ratings there was a short period of him leaving no stars, That is not a bad rating it is no rating just tags which are not bad. he has left 3 1 star ratings out of 58. plz can you all stop these nonsense reports and let the hunters deal with real cheating events, instead of wasting there time on this nonsense.

LOL but true eddie,, very true.
Sorry nuls, for now you will have to live with it

You can blame GA and his cronies for setting this precedent. My only thing Is I feel bad for the mods whose time they are wasting. This guy just doesn't know any better though, look at his games played.

nuls did you contact the accused and ask him to change your rating? 1 Rating doesn't make it abuse. Find 5 of his rating and detail why they are abusive. Just saying he has done this before or listing all the ratings of 1,1,1 isn't enough. And also the ratings that you consider abusive should be current ratings not ones that were done 6 or 8 months ago.

I'm curious why he is leaving people the "Good teammate" tag for games where it was Standard?

Evil Semp wrote:nuls did you contact the accused and ask him to change your rating? 1 Rating doesn't make it abuse. Find 5 of his rating and detail why they are abusive. Just saying he has done this before or listing all the ratings of 1,1,1 isn't enough. And also the ratings that you consider abusive should be current ratings not ones that were done 6 or 8 months ago.

es there is not five bad ratings in total off this guy there are only 3

nuls it would be appreciated when you file a complaint that you follow through when you receive a request for proof.

TheForgivenOne wrote:I'm curious why he is leaving people the "Good teammate" tag for games where it was Standard?

It looks to me that he doesn't really understand the ratings system. jamalelc is CLEARED of ratings abuse. I will send him a PM explaining the system.

After reading this I have some questions for you Evil Semp
This OP did not provide complete details ??Seems to be no problem for you ??
This Op was instructed not to go back six to eight months with the ratings report ??
This OP ,s case was CLEARED not Just closed
Why is this case in anyway different from the Three spurious complaints brought forward by General A recently in which we all received pms from you telling us you had just closed the reports because the OP was not providing info ??
Just wondering .To me just closing a report because of lack of info from a member ,who I might add initiated all three reports in a space of 35 minutes, leaves the impression something was up with the three accused .Correct me if Im wrong but it seems like a double standard .

this case was cleared because he did not have 5 bad ratings in total. in the other cases were there was bad ratings more than 5.(not saying they were wrong ratings) they were only closed because the op of them threads did not provide any evidence of abuse.

Ok Thanks for the Explaination

Barney Rubble wrote:After reading this I have some questions for you Evil Semp
This OP did not provide complete details ??Seems to be no problem for you ??
This Op was instructed not to go back six to eight months with the ratings report ??
This OP ,s case was CLEARED not Just closed
Why is this case in anyway different from the Three spurious complaints brought forward by General A recently in which we all received pms from you telling us you had just closed the reports because the OP was not providing info ??
Just wondering .To me just closing a report because of lack of info from a member ,who I might add initiated all three reports in a space of 35 minutes, leaves the impression something was up with the three accused .Correct me if Im wrong but it seems like a double standard .

OK Barney he is my thinking on why the three by GA were closed and this one was cleared.

I feel that GA filed those reports because he wasn't happy with his ratings ban. This report I felt that the OP really thought there was ratings abuse. I looked at some of the ratings you gave and the ratings given by the accused in this thread. As per the PM I sent you some of the tags you are leaving did not go along with the games for those ratings. Deadbeat when the player didn't deadbeat. You have played over 2000 games and left over 600 ratings so I feel you should know better. I feel that if GA wanted to do the leg work he might be able to come up with a case against you, the same with the other two threads started by GA. A quick look at the ratings by the accused in this thread I saw that there wouldn't be enough proof.

You mentioned the PM that I sent you. That was just sent as a courtesy to you to let you know that you should be more careful with the tags you leave.

So if there was any double standard used it was the one trying to prevent you from being accused of ratings abuse in the future.

Well thks for the explaination .However voicing your personal opinion on a case youve Closed ?? I also think you need to explain your last statement. If I read it correctly your insinuating an ulterior motive in asking a question about why one case was treated differently from another. I certainly hope that is not the case .