Page 1 of 1
Iceman100 Possible Multi/Secret Alliance[iceman busted]es

Posted:
Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:46 pm
by badgerbaytactica
Accused:
iceman100Kick-A$$The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s):
Game 8117764Comments: Honestly, I think Iceman100 is probably just an immature player making a poor attempt at a prank. Either way, he is portraying that he has a secret alliance with Kick-A$$ in the game chat. When I confronted Iceman100, he said it was a joke but threatened to give me a 1-star rating for delaying the game.
Re: Iceman100 Possible Multi/Secret Alliance

Posted:
Sat Dec 11, 2010 5:35 am
by iceman100
It was a "prank" as you call it. so why if you honestly think it was have you wasted important peoples time? If you had checked before complaining you would have found that out as we have never played before.. I do regret any wasted time cc bosses lose over this. We are non payers and have only four games, you have as many as you like. To make us wait 24 hours for a go when you knew we were both on line was a type of bullying. Thats why I threatened a 1 Star rating.. ok next time (if there is one) I will just give you my rating.. I am sorry to KickAss and to cc.
Re: Iceman100 Possible Multi/Secret Alliance

Posted:
Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:14 am
by badgerbaytactica
Iceman100, If you are a multi, you could have played with Kick-A$$ under a seperate account. Also, prolonging the game so CC moderators can determine if we have a multi/secret alliance is not a form of bullying. I can't recoup any lost points if I wait till the game is over to report. Therefore, I believe it is best to address the problem immediately. You should purchase a premium account to play more games. Also, look at your ratings! You have a horrific 2.9 rating. You should probably work on your reputation within the CC community.
Re: Iceman100 Possible Multi/Secret Alliance

Posted:
Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:09 am
by iceman100
I am afraid in England we play the game then complain not the other way round. You may not think of it as bullying delaying a game because it has no importance to you but with a bit of empathy you can see it now from other peoples perspective. Also your comment has not been thought through. If I had a multiple account I would just use them not get a third party involved. The lesson here is look at the power of the chat box.. I was actually trying to bait Kickass but you took the bait hook line and sinker. As far as my rating is concerned I play my way, not the way others want me to play. The computer actually decides the rules and only allows moves that are valid. Too many players have their own thoughts on what is right and what is wrong gameplay. Any idiot knows three player games are always open to arguments.
Re: Iceman100 Possible Multi/Secret Alliance

Posted:
Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:13 am
by iceman100
One last point. You joined the game after me and my rating did not seem to bother you then
Re: Iceman100 Possible Multi/Secret Alliance

Posted:
Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:43 pm
by Evil Semp
I don't see the secret diplomacy here. As far as trying to make it look like secret diplomacy in the game chat I would thing that is a form of diplomacy. He is trying to influence the outcome of the game in the chat, and there is nothing wrong with that.
Players have 24 hour to take their turns and it is not considered a form of bullying to wait to take your turn.
Kick-A$$ is CLEARED. Iceman100 has been BUSTED as a multi with wild card.