Conquer Club

vote and put up your reason why!

obviously the last two are jokes lol. where you you be without <territory></territory> and <continent></continent>? (without a map thats where)

4 votes beyond mine and no posts and which two people voted for the joke?!

EDIT: one more vote while i was typing in last msg and it went toward other half of joke!

its not the gimick

its how its used.

There is a map without continents, so I declare that they are unnecessary, therefor my vote is completely justified!

if you were to make a map, ANY MAP, the type of map doesnt matter, what gimmick would you most want to put on it?

im regretting putting the joke up there dangit

One-way borders... tho it barely qualifies as a gimmick.

I don't view continent gimmicks as a joke. If you look at Age of Merchants and Age of Might, continent gimmicks are a key factor.

spiesr wrote:There is a map without continents, so I declare that they are unnecessary, therefor my vote is completely justified!

which one?

oh heh duh circus maximus

dont play that map very often
im think im gonna start one now.

replacing neutrals.

Not on the list - my favorite is Teleports or Ranged Attacks.

I find the use of resources and factories in the Age of Merchants the most complelling variant here.

I also find clever use of the one-way passage very interesting, though it is misused more often them not. (Misused in a game-balance terms, not in play.)

Bombardment seems interesting, but I've yet to really see it used. The Western Front map has it, but I had fog-of-war on, so I really didn't get much of a feel for it, but it seemed like a punishment to be stationed in England.

I'd really like to see more gimmicks introduced however. The more the merrier...

Partial or <required> continents are my favourite...

C.