I've seen people benefit, but I'm not really interested in consuming an ally early game, before I know how he or she is going to play.

mandalorian2298 wrote:

neddiedrow wrote:Personal attack? On the internet? I'd recommend sticking to real guns, thanks.

Moron recomends guns. There's a shock!

Poster misses sarcasm. More at eleven.

Well... I'm me.

I expect to encounter longer and longer games if I continue to play Standard or Assassin games on World 2.1 - hopefully I can obtain opponents who are civil.

Optimus Prime wrote:I've never had much of a problem with truces. It seems most folks I've played with tend to make border truces, rather than an all out alliance. That's not so bad in my mind.

Sums it up for me as well.

The point I would pose is that the playing field was even, dependent on time investment and attention, prior to this and greasemonkey. Everybody had the same opportunities, but it required personal initiative. This is just another method of catering to the lazy - and that is illogical in a ...

Personal attack? On the internet? I'd recommend sticking to real guns, thanks.

Wair, you actually consider scripted aids to the game fair and logical? They simply exploit unprotected data to give you an edge your own attention should provide.

How about a Planar map modelled on the old D&D planes?

Astral, Ethereal, Positive Energy, Negative Energy, Abyss... etc?

Suicide rounds are perfectly legitimate.

JimRocky wrote:What's not to love? Other than someone just intentionally being a rebel or kidding around, or some idiot (which is unlikely since almost no idiot of that degree would ever find and play CC), the vote will be full positive.

I disagree.

I think this takes another factor that divides a skilled player from the average out and gives it, unfairly, to the masses. Suddenly, it is no longer a legitimate tactic to horde cards... fair enough for Escalating games, but this also impacts the much more reasonable Flat Rate games...

I just ...