Conquer Club. This is a browser-based Risk game similar to Grand Strategy.

Didn't the creator of Grand Strategy start his site and steal our maps and idea's from the to-do list? I agree, someone needs to register there and set them straight.



GS had tabs separating games into active, awaiting ...

Conquer Club. This is a browser-based Risk game similar to Grand Strategy.

Didn't the creator of Grand Strategy start his site and steal our maps and idea's from the to-do list? I agree, someone needs to register there and set them straight.



GS had tabs separating games into active, awaiting ...

Conquer Club. This is a browser-based Risk game similar to Grand Strategy.

Didn't the creator of Grand Strategy start his site and steal our maps and idea's from the to-do list? I agree, someone needs to register there and set them straight.



GS had tabs separating games into active ...

vic wrote:ok so in this version you can cash cards for NUKES!

just an idea!

grand strategy (http://denizengames.com) has this. they use command cards and one of them is nuke a country, kills all of the armies but 1.

we need to get lack to play some games there and then use their ideas.

try it here:

http://denizengames.com

Hi! I'm new here, so forgive me if this has been brought up before or if I did something stupid. I was thinking that there might be a better way to handle the placement of the armies at the beginning of the game. Having exactly 3 armies on each territory may save time with the setup, but it creates ...

It seems like the most realistic fortification method would be to combine adjacent and unlimited. So each turn each country with more than one army can make ONE adjacent fortification. It seams silly to have only one army to make one move. It also seems silly to have armies fly across the map in ...

Has anyone here played the Middle Earth on Lord of the rings risk? On it they incorporate strongholds which give a bonus +1 to the defenders die when they are on it. Just wondered what people thought of this and if it might get added at some point.

Just my 2 cents but if i'm standing in a castle ...

this option works great at Grand Strategy:

http://www.denizengames.com

if you don't like the games with the man per country limit, then don't join them!

Grand Strategy:

http://www.denizengames.com

Land Grab:

http://www.landgrab.net

i like Grand Strategy more than CC but i like the CC forums for reading

I 2nd this. landgrab and grand strategy do little updates.

desau sometimes does updates without posting notices. the people who do grand strategy are always posting notices on new updates.

So wasnt there supposed to be some big huge, CC changing update being released around this time ...

Grand Strategy sucks. I joined but quickly discovered it's quite limited when compared to CC. And CC is getting better.

well i have 2 games going on grand strategy and CC and I don't see much difference between the two. maybe Grand Strategy looks better. prettier pictures for the units.

CC ...

woh, I just saw a couple maps at grand strategy that i swear were ripped straight from axis and allies!

too bad they are only for premium ppl, but they make the CC maps look like kiddy toys.

I tried Landgrab out and whilst some of the stuff was quite neat - the realtime did work better. The ...

i'm pretty much a noob at all the sites. but why do you say LandGrab and Grand Strategy suck?

They both seem to have more things than CC does. i found you can use leaders and fortresses at LandGrab. you can alos place your troops at the first turn on Grand Strategy.

LG seems pretty slow. GS ...

How do you guys rank them?

I'm thinking:

1. CC - obviously

2. Grand Strategy - neat maps and 2 player option. they have some CC maps too?

3. LB - lots of options

4. WaW - Dead

5. DominateGame - have to pay for web version?

Hmmmm.... interesting... very interesting.
WaW is ...