this is like days of our lives and im sitting on the edge of my seat waiting to see what happens next.....

Hahaha pieboy...u dredging up old posts again

I think u have had enough XXXX for the night.

And for all of you wondering what XXXX is..Its the beer they drink in Queensland.

And the ...

gibbom won over 2000 points in a game

Interestingly I couldn't find more than a handful of public games played by the top 40 players that were true risk format,

4-8 players, flat rate, sequential

....

Personally only like to play 6-8 player, standard, flat rate / no cards, sequential. If this means that I am going to struggle to get ...

The actual rank you have is arbitrary, in my opinion. Just because you made captain or major out to be some big deal doesn't mean anything really changed. You are still ranked _______(insert number) on this site, and whether we call them all privates or colonels that won't change.

Quite true ...

New Recruit
Cook
Cadet
Private -1000
Private 1st Class-1100
Specialist-1200 ---------------- new
Corporal-1300
Corporal 1st Class-1400
Sergeant-1500
Staff Sergeant -1600 ------ new
Sergeant 1st Class-1700
Sergeant Major-1800 ------------ new
Officer Candidate -2000----------- new
Lieutenant-2200 ...

Well done guys!

Well said and good point! this however also paints all other high ranking players with the same paint. They are then all guilty! Again this comes down to the highly ineffective points system!

I don't wish to pass judgement one way or the other, but it does not paint all other high ranking ...

None the less, all you needed to do to end this argument was admit that you failed to take into account the many games in which high ranked players do play one another and back off this generalization.

I didn't fail to take those into account because I wasn't talking about those games.

And...it ...

This a stupid accusation - you have provided no evidence apart from the fact that JR played with this guy and won...

At least point out some suspicious actions in the game. I strongly suspect this is driven out of a personal grudge than any fair review of the evidence at hand.

Most high ranks will play against each other to some extent... there are some who mostly play against high ranks - you can check my games if you like, I haven't played too many against all-comers recently (I think I have one open). Comic boy is another guy with a similar philosophy.

I've played ...

Some thoughts:

On the auto-attack issue, I used to never use it when taking out players in escalating singles games, because I was paranoid about losing 40 armies in a row... however now I often use it because:

1) I am too lazy to attack everytime now, it used to take me nearly a full hour to ...

One way to settle it could be to see if everyone will agree to playing another game, but make it escalating this time, and the winner of that game gets to win the circus maximus game too...

MaXimVs wrote:My brother, who uses this account, is out of town. I happen to have his password, so I am totally screwing him over!!! Join my games for free points, as he won't be back for two weeks from England and I was supposed to play his games for him

Make me...

I knew you top guns were fixing the cards and dice all along. I'm no worse than you really. The fact that I lack the vision in games has nothing to do with my being 2400 (damn that's a scary number - we captains etc really do have a long way to go) points of top score

Haha - there is an ...

Nice work mate!

The ranks are certainly an indication of skill. Ive simply never seen a player at captain, or even leutenant that did not play the game well.

Hang on... isn't that AAFitz character a captain? I can write tiny that I'm joking...

Back on topic (sort of) I think rank is a direct indicator of ...

a2zsteve wrote:We've blocked you from playing new games with the members mentioned above.

a2zsteve wrote:Newleaf is my wife - we have never played in the same game together, we dont intend to either

Why do you care then? If you never intend to play each other, the block will have no effect on you.

but in KLOBBERS game are also noobs:

general gersh
general_gore
general O
generalleeadyck (isn't that last one so KLOBBER)

and in yours is: generalgavin

Are you serious? General is a popular name on a world domination website?

There are 73 generals on the scoreboard, perhaps they are all ...

Kemmler wrote:lol

you beat 3 2000+

but still only won 42pts...

That's a lot of points for a 2 team game!

The game number in question was 100970

That game finished over a year ago (November 2006)

sjnap wasn't a general then... in fact he had only joined the site a few weeks earlier, so his score would have been much lower, perhaps around 1000, the other player obviously had a higher score at the ...

Oggiss, do you think it is possible that KLOBBER is framing you? We were "challenged" to start games like his and "see what happens"

Perhaps he filled your games with noobs to make himself look innocent...... or make you look guilty

I pointed out that in your games there was noobs with the names ...

Very poor form by Jamie, but can't say I'd expect any better from him

This is like CC's brokeback mountain...

Whilst I might have technically cheated the site (although they did get an extra premium out of it), what has really really got to me is the insinuation that this follows through to cheating in the game space - which I abhor.

I don't know whether you're cheating the site... but I think you are ...

I have played with deguu many times. He is good enough to win any game without any help. I highly doubt that he is involved in foul play.

I agree with you here kid... but the argument that someone is good enough to win without cheating is a poor one, there have been plenty of cheats who were ...