Offically ended now and winner is me weeeee ^^ (kinda cheated since i liked all maps, but i had that one exeption of P.R. [love the map, but hate settings and that it's 1st to go, wins in 1v1 ^^])
gga this was a fun tourny ^^
well we got 2 brittish isles, but no woodboros so i bet there relys the answer to that ^^ figured that HA didn't bother to find out why and also if he noticed, he prolly wouldn't said cos he's pissed off that u knocked him out xD
well i go first in every single game (yeh wow) so it doesn't most ...
Well eh.... that's y i said 3 min. rule is reasonable (for those reasons and some other). That being lucky to advance by only playing 1 or 2 was just cos.... well that would be pretty damn lucky xD
umm.... since that response, i guess u didn't get what i ment. I was indeed making a solution where only winners advance. Actually that was my main point with that comment so might want to read it again ^^ (those 3 last rows)
If u don't go with that. Then u'll need to do round robin like rotation/s ...
i'll just bumb this to let u guys know that if someone is interested to take over this platform, just let me know. i did this one day, but never rly bothered to continue and yes you can do whatever u wish with it ^^
so small as possible with all cities and connecting regions between. ok ^^ yeh i guess i'll check out then.
tho that already gave me the enough idea to start thinking bonuses and sizes and stuff
btw what's with avatar changing frenzy? xD
So i can do double post if someone won't bother read that longer one ^^
I'd just like to hear at least very raw roundabout mapsize, dynamic, maybe neutral count.... just to give me some direction where to go with this/ what u rly wanted to do with this. (I mean; map size could vary like hella lot ...
No worries, we have lots of time to refine this... this will have to wait until one of my current maps gets to FF. yeh catched that. was just saying ^^
Wasn't quite catching which way u were going. I guess u were leaning towards random drops, but I just assumed that u aren't using all the dots ...
Sorry. Haven't rly had time to think (something complex like) this, but maybe it's not so big loss since my head just oveflows with ideas about this and can't decide how best way to go and yeh i have just completely different variations in my head so can't rly even pin point anything. gah u rly had ...
Okay attacking was as i thought. Tho yeah so everything i put to attack, advances. Was just thinking case where i attack Australia, but want to leave troops in China afterwards for example. Guess i'll just have to deploy em out later. Well since i'm in question mode i'll make one more thing sure ...
1. Well there ain't auto-assault, but is it treated almost as similarly as a-a if i got example 4 in territory and i say that i attack with 1 so i attack until i have 3 so that's one 3v2/3v1 attack and so on, like 12 and i say i attack with 9?
Well... i didn't rly have to watch this map too long to see what's wrong. there is actually a reason y all games with set up positions with +x auto-deploy have distance to each others and/or big neutrals between (just checking all those out and comparing to this one, u'll see exactly what i mean ...