When you are trying to kill your target? Can someone take this idiots ability to comment away? http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=10967343

I don't know what red was claiming. You were eliminated but the only person who conquered one of his regions was pink. Did you attack ...

There really is something to this, though - something is awfully fishy with that algorithm... I find that in 1v1 games, the person who is trailing (me or my opponent) tends to roll better than the person who is winning.

Conversely, I've found that in larger games (4+) where I am heavily favored to ...

I've been told by a number of people that the dice are fixed. Just wondering how the server decides which players get good dice and which ones get bad dice. Presumably every time one players gets bad dice someone else is getting good dice. I've just started playing so is there any way to know ...

i don't like this idea.

if you want to limit who can play your games then use the function already built into this site. PRIVATE GAMES.

I know about this. Create Private Game then invite players to join or post in Call-Out.

The problem are :
- Most players don't like PM-Spam
- Most players don ...

I think it's a lot easier to add a "level limit" similar to "round limit", that we already have.

The options will be :
⋅  none (default)
⋅ +/- 1
⋅ +/- 2
⋅ +/- 3
⋅ ...

Examples :
- a Major create a game and chooses "+/- 2", so the game can be ...

I know it is already submitted, but I would like to throw my two cents in. I think that it would be more useful to use the score at the start of the game (or even when the player joined) than at the end of the game (which seemed to be the focal point of the older thread). I think about when I ...

I have always wanted an option like this, and wish it was not turned down all the time. I would not want to always create games that way, but when I try a new map, choosing to play members around my rank should help protect me from some of the people who know how to play that map so well I basically ...

I agree with this. On a side note, why did greenoaks have to say why he/she disagrees if those who agree did not have to state why they agree. If the intent of the thread is to gauge interest, simply disagreeing helps with that. It just doesn't help the op change the suggestion. If one does not like ...

it makes no sense if someone attacks you and you wouldn't even know you lost a region. (especially in the first turn)

i mean, is any country so disorganized that they would not remember exactly which region they lost in a war?

they may not have noticed which region the attack came from (altho i ...

Sign me up. 1118 atm.

on the list

I like the idea, however as I read it, I think it will cause more stalemating than anything else. As others have pointed out, attacking another player's stack may result in giving that player an advantage on their turn. Let's say that I have a stack of 15 against a stack of ten, and both of us are ...

It seems to me that there are two schools of thought on this suggestion.

1. I don't like map x.

2. Random maps can negatively affect tourney play.

While I agree that there are maps I prefer not to play, I also agree with those who have said that people would just start their own games instead of ...

I believe this will also work (rather than digging through your user directory for "bob"):

1. Click on Tools/GreaseMonkey/Manage User Scripts
2. Select "Conquer Club - BOB" (left pane)
3. Click on Edit (under left pane)
4. This opens a notepad file


It didnt do this for me, what happened

me ...

Mmm... just remember ya'll who are posting suggestions/modifications that the underlying code of the game engine presently only allows for certain map modifications.

With respect to your suggestions - Again, I like the idea. But I'm pretty sure that even with your modifications, this man they ...

Maybe more territories, still only three per, and the turns you described. I think giving the one player so many armies is dangerous. More territories means more armies to deploy, but not an exorbitant amount. Also, it would mean that there would still be a normal first turn for that player.

I would like the personal ascending option. I hate attacking early in an ascending game to get a bonus, just to be forced to turn in cards for 4 armies, and by me next turn someone has turned in cards for 12 or 15. I would much prefer that the ascending values be applied to individuals and not the ...

This would mostly help people who don't use firefox. Some people play from libraries(my nephew who referred me) which usually use internet explorer and cannot be helped by firefox plugins.

The firefox plugin lets you fade out the map.

no way man. That takes half the strategy out of the attack. Besides, smart people can figure it out a little bit in their heads anyway.

How does it take strategy out? Knowing your odds of success, if anything, helps with strategy. Are you saying that you like playing against people who attack ...

I would actually prefer it be not in my games, but in the game itself. Somewhere near the top. Sometimes, I will be using the chat from the beginning, and nothing from my teammate, so I assume they don't use it, and don't notice that two days ago they finally said something in round 80(obvious ...

I was having trouble with my browser

I actually think this favors the one player. the only way it would not, is if the team maneuvered it so that one of them held most of the borders to the one's territory, and the other two mainly fed that player the armies.

Also, the first turn of the one would be a total killer. I think that ...

I don't really like it. The reason to choose either of those options, is to make the game last longer than with unlimited. You must strategize your conquering more without an unlimited number of forts.

What about before the first turn. For instance, if I start a game, let's say two player, and I notice before I take my turn that the other person has a lot of bad negative feedback(which I always check), I may not want to play that game. I think there should be an option to get out of a game before ...

This way you could see how good or bad you did in reference to your odds. I agree that it is not anywhere near a priority, but it would be cool.